Viewing entries in
Phillies

Comment

First we take Manhattan ...

Central Park MapNEW YORK — Wouldn't you know it ... Anton Krupicka was in New York City today for a screening of In the High Country, a movie I caught at the premier in Boulder, Colo. last July. After the movie I had a chance to talk with Anton and told him about how tough runners don't just scale 14,000-feet of rock. Sometimes the tough guys run in the heat and humidity of Central Park.

As it turned out, it was humid in Central Park this afternoon. It was about 92 percent, according to the weather stats, and it would have been unbearable if it had not been for the snow falling over the city.

I didn't see Krupicka in the park on Monday or Tuesday, but I bet he was there. After all, where else is a guy going to run in the middle of Manhattan?

Central Park has it all. There are hills, trails, woods, lakes, waterfalls and wild life. There is also sweeping vistas of the skyscrapers to go along with the nature. Mix in the tourists, the city life and tons of runners and bikers and the park is the nexus of the world. 

It doesn't take long to see the genius of Frederick Law Olmsted within 400-meters inside of the park's borders. Central Park just might be the greatest piece of American architecture ever created. It's truly an inspiring place and there are few better places in which to run in the world.

The test in the park, of course, is running the big loop. Not only is it approximately 10 kilometers around without veering off to other trails, but also the big loop passes by seemingly every social, cultural and financial castes. In fact, one of the prettiest spots in the park is the Harlem Meer and the nature trails on the north side of the park. 

Neither the Meer nor the Harlem side of the park are not part of the Central Park Marathon, a race I'm jumping into on Feb. 23. Instead, the marathon course will be the very same five loops run in the 2007 Olympic Trials, one of the most exhilarating and tragic days in American running history.

It was a great day because Ryan Hall, Dathan Ritzenhein and Brian Sell made the Olympic team. Hall did so spectacularly while Sell fought for third place as if he was in a gang fight. Hall also established himself as the most talented American-born marathoner ever by obliterating the field and a hilly course in 2:09. Over terrain more favorable to fast running, Hall might have challenged the American record.

2012-04-15_10-50-32_633The tragedy occurred nearly 30 minutes and approximately 5.5 miles into the race when Ryan Shay collapsed and died on the course of a heart attack caused by an enlarged heart. By the time the ambulance got into the park and carried Shay to nearby Lenox Hill Hospital, he was gone. In a cruel irony, the ambulance carrying Shay passed the leaders of the race near the nine-mile mark. Hall, Ritzenhein and Sell had no idea what was happening.

These days there is nothing to indicate the exact spot where Shay collapsed. But for those who take their runs through Central Park, no marker is needed. 

We can feel it.

There is a rock along the side of the road just north of the Boat House on the east side where Shay fell. For those of us who know what happened on Nov. 4, 2007, our eyes are drawn to the spot as we close in on the Boat House. Running through that area of the park feels like a sacred act. It's like passing through a shrine site where one of "our guys" went down.

The memory of Ryan Shay is one of the reasons why many of us run. Distance running, and marathon running in particular, is as beautiful as a sport can be. Bathed in simplicity, running is as pure as athletics can be. But it’s also a cruel sport. Often, every weakness is exposed during a competition no matter how strong or well prepared a runner is.

But then again, that’s part of why we love the sport so much.

The only memorial to Ryan Shay in the park is a bench, located on the other side of the road from "Ryan's Rock." The inscription reads:

"It is necessary to dig deep within oneself to discover the hidden grain of steel called will.
Ryan Shay, 1979-2007

It's going to be an honor to run a marathon in Central Park along the course used for the Olympic Trials. It's also going to be tough and hilly. It's going to take a lot of strength.

It always does. 

***

Here's a shot of the Harlem Meer from a run around the park last January:

IMG_0353

This is a shot of the park from the Essex House on 59th Street from last February:

IMG_0387

And this is the statue of Fred Lebow, the legendary director of the New York City Marathon:

Image-1 (1)

Comment

Comment

Quick turnaround

When you decide to run a marathon on low mileage and no long runs, it's difficult to gauge how fast you'll go. The only way to know is to go out there and run it.

So that's what I did on Nov. 30 in Sparks, Md. at the Northern Central Trail Marathon. The result was 26 miles in 3:21:13, (almost an hour slower than my best time) which was a good indicator of my fitness.

Here is what it looked like:

Nike+

The splits for the race were strangely consistent, despite not training the way I would have liked. I got a little tired and tight around 21 or 22 miles, but was able to keep moving at a decent clip.

You know ... considering.

Splits

Nike+

It was a pretty good day. The footing on the course was a little tough in spots, and it was cold. But the race was fun and well organized. 

The best part about the race was I didn't get too banged up. The day after I ran five miles with only a bit of post-marathon soreness. By the end of the week, I was holding myself back so I don't overload myself so quickly.

But that marathon itch is tough to scratch. Because I'm old and time is short, I'm running the Central Park Marathon on Feb. 23. That one is five loops around the park, a very familar loop from trips to New York City.

It should be a lot of fun.

And then after that one, how about the Garden Spot Marathon in Lancaster County, Pa.? Yeah, why not? I know a lot of serial marathoners and it seems as if the weekly workload isn't too hot. The key will be to drop some weight and get those long runs in.

I'm ready.

Comment

Comment

Of altitude, mountain climbing and running ...

IMG_0616So...

I had a bunch of in depth and insightful thoughts on how running in humidity is tougher and more difficult than running at high altitude. Then there were the ideas about the Trayvon Martin case has been one of the great injustices and how Americans are really bad at understanding nuance.

These were going to be trenchant posts all related to running and surely will come out on this site again soon enough. However, they are going to be put on the back burner for a time because I just got back from Colorado.

And just like always, it's a trip to Colorado that has jump started another build-up for a marathon.

How so? How could an old salty veteran like me be rejuvenated by yet another trip to Estes Park, the Rocky Mountain National Park and Boulder? After all, it's not like I haven't gone up there to put in some miles before.

Certainly this is true. Then again, I never made an attempt to run up to Longs Peak and attend a world-wide movie premiere featuring Anton Krupicka running up Longs Peak.

Anton Krupicka? Of course, in a sport like ultrarunning that is filled with badasses and envelope pushers, Krupicka is currently the baddest of the bad. Close followers of running already know about Krupicka because of the superficialities like his long hair, beard and shirtless runs for hundreds of miles per week. Then there are the victories in some of the most prestigious ultramarathons in the country ... these are all the things that get a guy known.

But the thing about Krupicka that is most interesting is that it isn't really about those things. Kind of like the running version of Ian MacKaye, Krupicka is interested in running for the sake of running. It means something to him that can't really be cheapened by categorization or a pursuit of resume fodder. Maybe that's why lately Krupicka has seemingly been focused on running the highest peaks in Colorado instead of trying to get from point A to point B faster than someone else.

Besides, as I learned again last week, there is something about climbing a mountain that teaches a person a lot about where he fits in. Some, like Krupicka and his partner in making In the High Country, Joel Wolpert, find a connection to nature and place in these pursuits. There's a transcendentalism to it.

Frankly, I go the other way. When battling the wind and the chill while moving up the trail up the east side of Longs Peak, I felt like I was small and insignificant. My sense of place was that I was nothing more than a tiny speck -- just a blip on a line to infinity.

IMG_0600

IMG_0602

Nope, it's not about me. The warning signs on the trail kind of spell it out. On the mountain (or anywhere else on earth), I don't matter. But you know what? That's pretty life affirming in some weird sense. The idea that we are insignificant should free us of our egos and allow us to be ourselves. In Krupicka's and Wolpert's movie, that theme is evident.

When running up a mountain, Krupicka gets that it isn't about him.

I especially felt that way when looking up toward the Granite Pass:

IMG_0606

Anyway, Krupicka and Wolpert made a fantastic movie. It's a film that smarter reviewers than me say flips the script on conventional running movies. Instead of some inner battle or agonizing fight to complete or win a race, the movie was about running. Actually, make that running up mountains. 

Running. Pure and simple.

Better yet, Wolpert, the filmmaker, is a tremendous photographer. The film was shot beautifully along some terrain and spaces that may never have seen a movie camera before.

Here's a look at the trailer:

[vimeo http://www.vimeo.com/58457574 w=1000&h=562]

Distribution for the film is still being worked out. However, there are tentative plans to hold screenings in West Virginia, New York, Washington, Philadelphia and Lancaster. My suggestion is to download it and to go to a screening near you.

Meanwhile ...

There is nothing that gets a runner going than a trip to Colorado. The altitude, the weather, the lack of humidity, the hills and the scenery are just part of it. Running, in all its forms, really is a part of life in that part of the country. Hell, just being outside is the way it is out there. 

Before we get into the trek up the mountain, here's the week of running in Colorado ...

Tuesday, July 16, 2013
10.05 miles
Fish Creek

Ran down Fish Creek Road and then turned around and went back up. Started at around 8,170-feet of altitude and went down to 7,500-feet. It used to be that I had to run on the narrow shoulder going up (or down) Fish Creek, but now there is a beautiful new running trail made of crushed cinders.

Perfect.

Better yet, my pace held up and lends credence to my theory that humidity is more difficult than altitude.

Wednesday, July 17, 2013
10 miles
Fish Creek

Same exact run as Tuesday. The difference was I ran faster, especially down the mountain.

Thursday, July 18, 2013
10 miles
Fish Creek to Lake Estes

Mixed it up by going down Fish Creek and, instead of going back up, I circled Lake Estes. The trail around the lake is built up now, too. Good stuff.

We need more running trails at sea level.

Friday, July 19, 2013
7 miles
Longs Peak Trailhead to Granite Pass

I didn't think I was going to get too much farther than the Boulderfield on the Key Hole route to the summit of Longs Peak, but man oh man was the "run" tougher than I anticipated. Aside from the rugged terrain, the toughest part was the chilly and windy climate above the tree line. Like a dummy I wore a sleeveless shirt and got a little worried about exposure. Also causing worries were the clouds and threatening-looking clouds on top of Longs Peak.

Very tough. I worked my ass off and covered just 7ish miles in two hours.

IMG_0607

Friday, afternoon

5.25 miles

Added a second run because I don't feel like I actually ran while on the mountain. About 3 or 4 miles in, I got pretty tired.

Saturday, July 20, 2013
10 kilometers
Fish Creek

Gassed. Quads were pretty sore. Felt OK through the first half and then fell apart.

Sunday, July 21, 2013
11.5 miles
Fish Creek to Lake Estes

Still tired and sore but didn't tie up. Definitely got tired at the end, though, but that was probably from the sun beating down on me instead of the altitude and the run. Perhaps the flatness of the trail around the lake helped.

The mountain ...

Yes, it was difficult. Surprisingly, it was more difficult than expected. At one point of the "run," I had a clear view of the Twin Sisters Peak, a run I bagged in 2008 that began at 9,000-feet and ended at 11,428-feet above sea level. On that run, I struggled on some of the switchbacks and long steps. I also got a tremendous headache above the treeline near the summit. It made me want to get to lower altitude quickly.

Twin Sisters from Longs ...

IMG_0604

So maybe the reason why I thought the ride up Longs would be "easy" was because I forgot about the experience of going up Twin Sisters. It's like the old saying that a person shouldn't race another marathon until they complete forget about the last one.

Bingo.

Anyway, I didn't get any altitude headaches on the way up. I did feel as though I was going to freeze to death, though. I should have brought a long-sleeved shirt.

More importantly, I realized that I'm no Krupicka and maybe mountain running isn't my niche. It's really tough and maybe not as rewarding as running in cities, trails or near historical sites. Plus, you don't really run up the mountain. You just kind of keep moving ... you survive it.

Hopefully I'll remember all of that the next time. Hopefully it ends with a few pictures from the summit and not the clouds resting on top of it.

IMG_0611

Comment

Comment

Progress, or something

So we tore off three more weeks of workouts and it's difficult to see any progress. Worse yet, July started with a case of the dreaded DOMS, which is somehting I never experienced except for after a marathon.

I guess this is what happens when a guy gets old.

Nevertheless, June was pretty uneventful. I missed one workout because I was up until 4:30 a.m. covering the NBA Draft and struggled with some heat and humidity while with the kids at the beach.

On the plus side, I got to run a bunch of flat loops in Philadelphia and the beach, which is a good way to check out strength and leg turnover. It also begs the question if there are any hills at all in Philadelphia?

The city is flat as a pancake.

Anyway, here's the non-eventful June. Let's hope July offers more progress and challenges. Tentatively, I'm hoping to turn out some good runs in Colorado, like an ascent of Longs Peak, as well as some quality miles in Detroit at the end of the month. 

That town looks flat, too.

Anyway, here's how we're building up for the Harrisburg Marathon in November ...

June 24-30

June 30, 2013
10.3 miles
Tired legs and a weak hamstring after running nine miles of hills on Saturday. Wasn't into it, but as the run progressed there was no point in stopping before 10 miles.

June 29, 2013
12.03 miles
After running on flat roads for a week, why not try a roller coaster loop for nine miles in the Lancaster County Park? The good part about the run is there was lots of shade in the park. I also saw a deer even though crossing paths with wild animals on a run freaks me out. The rough part? Up and down those hills. Oh well ... hills are a good way to build strength.

June 28, 2013
ZERO
Up all night the day before covering the NBA Draft. I didn't get home until 4 a.m. and didn't get to bed until a while after that. Rather than run tired and risk an injury with a weak muscle, I stayed indoors. Otherwise, it was a pretty crazy night. The Sixers didn't just blow it up, they nuked it. Hard to imagine that there will be many survivors from past seasons.

June 27, 2013
5.01 miles
Started out with some solid 7s and then the heat/humidity and a stomach ache ended the run. It didn't feel like typical stomach pain from heat cramps, but maybe it was. Whatever. Sucked.

June 26, 2013
6.25 miles in morning
4.11 miles in early evening
Felt a little better in the morning with the heat. Still tough to acclimate, though. The evening runs have been fun and I felt fairly fresh.

June 25, 2013
5.04 miles in morning
5.07 miles in early evening

Doubled up. Remember when doubles were 12 to 15 in the morning and 5 in the early evening? Doesn't seem like it was all that long ago. Nevertheless, the short, quick doubles are a good way to beat the heat. Seem to get more out of it, too.

June 24, 2013
3.6 miles
Planned to take a day off after driving all morning to Ocean City. But then I thought about Gary Player and how he always worked out after traveling as a way to combat fatigue and jetlag.

Week: 51.4 (more like weak).

June 17-23

June 23, 2013
8.35 miles
Covered the Phillies game all day and ran on Kelly Drive on the way out of town. Hadn't planned on running, but realized I would have felt like a piece of trash if I didn't do it. Ran steady 7s around the flat, river route.

June 22, 2013
10.01 miles
Slow.

June 21, 2013
10.26 miles
Slooooow.

June 20, 2013
10.14 miles
Hamstring grabbed a bit. Nothing to get worried about. Ran most of the time on grass. The change in surface may have caused the hamstring thing.

June 19, 2013
10 miles
Moved a little bit. Didn't slow down until the last 5K.

June 18, 2013
10.01 miles
Solid. Ran in the rain. No big deal.

June 17, 2013
10.07 miles
Just a boring, old 10-miler. Nothing to see here.

 

Comment

Comment

Here we go ...

Remember me? The runner? Yeah, well I'm older and much slower than I used to be, but at least we're gearing up for another stab at it.

That's right, on Nov. 10 I'm running the Harrisburg Marathon. Since I'm in the masters class now, the goal is to try and win as the fastest old guy. The problem is there are a lot more fast old guys and I'm not sure I'm one of them.

We'll see, though. I figure if Joan Benoit Samuelson can run 2:50 at Boston at age 56, I ought to be able to do it, too.

Right?

Anyway, as the weeks progress I will update the training progress. Mostly I'm doing it for myself because I like writing and reading other training blogs. I don't suspect others do, but whatever. Hopefully, it will be interesting to the other running-type geeks out there.

And since I travel often and take a camera with me on rare occasions, maybe I'll spice it up with different things I come across on the roads. Since I started the training again I've run in Washington, D.C.; New York City; Indianapolis; Chicago; Dallas; Houston; New Orleans; Boston; Florida; Atlanta; Philadelphia; Valley Forge; State College and probably a few other places I forget. I also have trips planned to Colorado and Detroit where I'm excited about getting out and running around. 

Anyway, here's the first week of serious training:

Tuesday, June 4 (morning)

7.1 miles
Not the start I wanted, but it worked.

Tuesday, June 4 (evening)

3.2 miles
Nothing gets a runner in shape quicker than doubles. I think it's a metabolism thing. Whatever it is, it's fun. No, it often doesn't feel like fun when you try to push yourself out the door. But once you get going the low-key easy ones are fun because they pay off.

Wednesday, June 5

10 miles
Didn't get out until after work and then ran in South Philly through the Navy Yard. What a treat that was ... empty roads of a near-deserted city as well as the remnants of American industrial and military muscle. The old Naval parts were bloated, tired, rusting and abandoned. Sprinkled in is new office space for the new American corporate and technological muscle.

And everyone had gone home so I had the roads to myself. Fun.

Thursday, June 6

10.1 miles
Consistent mile splits through the neighborhood. The pace was solid even when running on grass for a couple of miles.

Friday, June 7

4 miles
Dark and rainy. Ran on a crappy indoor track and a treadmill at the YMCA and hated it. It's not the YMCA's fault (well, the crappy track is). I just don't like running inside.

SaturdaySaturday, June 8

12.1 miles
Ran nine miles of hills in Lancaster County Park. I had hoped to go 14-plus, but the hills were pretty tough and by the 10th and 11th miles I was shuffling a bit. Otherwise, it was a lot of fun. The County Park is slowly becoming a favorite place to run.

Check out the elevation ... it's not altitude, but there were some climbs.

Sunday, June 9

10.1 miles
Easy 10 through the neighborhood and some of the neighbors were out to chat a bit. Otherwise, the run was a lot like Thursday ... consistent and steady. Nothing to get excited about.

Total: 57 miles

It's a start.

Comment

Comment

Kibosh!

The powers that be (you know, the ones that pay me) shut down this little site. As it stands, I cannot write the off-beat stuff here anymore, but I am allowed to write a book. Therefore, the plan is to use this site as the inspiration as some sort of epic tome about sports, silliness and, of course, love.

You know, the usual stuff.

In the meantime,check back for updates and stuff like that. 

xoxoxox,

jrf

Comment

Comment

The lost art of the triple-double

Spencer+Hawes+Chicago+Bulls+v+Philadelphia+fI5TGCFYL5ulMIAMI – In an age of advanced metrics and heightened statistical analysis, the triple-double still stands alone. Often it is the pinnacle of all basketball accomplishments. To get double-digits in points, assists and rebounds, or even blocks or steals, is the mark that a ballplayer had a really good game.

Actually, a triple-double is a true indicator of the all-around player. Typically, players don’t get them by accident. In other words, all of a sudden a player isn’t going to “get hot” and mess around to get a triple-double.

If it could be labeled as such, the triple-double is the most organic of all statistical phenomenons, yet they never sneak up on anyone. If someone is an assist or a rebound or two away from a triple-double, everyone in the gym knows it and they keep track. A triple-double is like a hand grenade, in that when it is about to blow, it makes some noise. That's the way it seemed when Larry Bird and Magic Johnson used to get them. 

And yet heading into Sunday’s action, there has been just one triple-double in the NBA this year. It came from the Celtics’ Rajon Rondo on Jan. 1, when he put 18 points, 11 rebounds and 14 assists on the Washington Wizards. 

Yes, even though the season has reached the quarter pole, the triple-double has become more elusive than ever.

Maybe it’s just a lost art?

“I don’t know if it’s a lost art, it’s just always been rare,” said Andre Iguodala, a player who is known for filling out the stat sheet. “You have your guys from different eras who always got them starting with Oscar Robertson and Magic and Larry did it a bit. I remember one year M.J had about 11 or maybe more. Then you have Jason Kidd, LeBron is up there, Rondo is up there and Chris Paul gets them every now and again, so you have your select few guys.”

Actually, the select club has trimmed down its members this year. Perhaps it’s because players are a bit behind offensively because of the lockout or maybe the scouting and the defenses have gotten so good that the triple-double has begun to disappear from the game like the mid-range jump shooter.

“You have to be a unique guy physically to get that just because you have to rebound or get assists, that’s tough,” said Sixers’ coach Doug Collins, who as one of those mid-range jump shooters back in the day, never got a triple-double.

Oh, but he’s coached a few unique players, including Michael Jordan and Scottie Pippen in Chicago and Grant Hill in Detroit. He also has Iguodala in Philadelphia who has seven career triple-doubles.

“There are a lot of guys who are on that cusp,” Collins said. “If you’re a smaller player, to get 10 rebounds is a lot and if you’re a bigger player to get 10 assists is a lot. So you have to be that hybrid guy who plays on the perimeter, who handles the ball, who has the size – Grant Hill had the size, Magic Johnson had the size, Jason Kidd had the size. If you look at the triple-double guys, you have to have the size to get the rebounds and the assists.”

But as Iguodala explains it, there really is no trick to getting a triple-double. A self-professed gunner in his younger days, Iguodala says he never really learned to be a good passer until he got to the University of Arizona and learned from the son of one of the best-passing big men ever to play.

“Luke Walton taught me how to get triple-doubles. I had one in high school, but in college, Luke Walton really taught me how to get them,” Iguodala explained. “He used to kill me every day at practice during my first year. He was the slowest guy, couldn’t jump off the ground – a slow white dude and how is he beating me? He’s beating me with the pass and everything, but he taught me how to pass and how to keep it simple.”

Keep it simple, as in don’t get caught up in it, is a pretty good way to go about it says Sixers’ ball-friendly big man, Spencer Hawes, who missed one on opening night in Portland by an assist. In that game Hawes said he kept his mind on the game, unlike the time when he was playing for Sacramento against the Sixers and came an assist shy of the triple-double.

“In the Portland game I don’t think at any point that I was forcing it. It was just the flow of the game, we were moving the ball and guys were finishing shots for me and it happened for me once before in my second year against the Sixers,” Hawes said. “I remember being a lot more caught up in it and I had the assists count in my head. I got the rebounds and the points early and then I started on the assist count and I got too caught up in it. A guy missed a layup and a guy missed a three-pointer, and I was thinking, ‘No!’ This time I just let it flow.”

Hawes has gotten close, but not all the way there. Interestingly, though, he remembered a game in high school when he nearly got a quadruple-double until his coach benched him.

“I started taunting the crowd and the coach pulled me out,” Hawes said.

Wait… what?

“I air balled a free throw and the crowd started chanting, ‘air ball’ at me,” he said. “I made the next one and I turned and started chanting, ‘scoreboard’ and then he yanked me. I think I was two blocks and three assists away from a quadruple-double.”

Still, though Rondo is the only guy to get a triple-double this season, there have been a handful of near misses. Six players have come within one assist of getting it, including Iguodala last Wednesday night and Hawes in the season opener in Portland. Sixers’ guard Evan Turner also missed a triple-double by two assists in a game last week, and boy did he know it. After the game when he returned to the locker room, his phone was filled with text messages from friends.

“I’m saving my first triple-double for later,” Turner joked. “When I get one everyone is going to know it.”

Turner isn’t much of a threat to catch Kidd, who, with 107 triple-doubles, is the active leader. Meanwhile, Robertson, famously, averaged a triple-double during the 1961-62 season for the Cincinnati Royals before folks even knew what it was he was doing. That season Robertson averaged 30.8 points, 11.4 assists and 12.5 rebounds per game, making him the only player ever to pull off the feat. He almost did it during his rookie season, too, going for 30.5 points, 10.1 boards and 9.7 assists per game in 1960-61 and again in 1962-63 when The Big O came seven rebounds away from the triple-double average.

Magic Johnson came 29 rebounds and 37 assists away from doing it in 1981-82 and 107 rebounds away from pulling it off in 1982-83.

For the Sixers, Iguodala had three triple-doubles last season, which is the most in franchise history since Charles Barkley got three of them during the 1986-87 season. Then again, the records are incomplete and it wasn’t until later when some players realized what they were doing. For instance, the Sixers have the only double triple-double in NBA history when Wilt Chamberlain got 22 points, 25 rebounds and 21 assists against Detroit at the Spectrum in 1968. Chamberlain also got a quadruple-double, but because steals and blocks were not an official stat in the NBA until the 1973 season, he doesn’t have credit for it.

In the meantime,if there is one statistical anomaly all players pay attention to, it’s those triple-doubles.

“I always keep in touch with how I am with active players,” Iguodala said. “I think I’m like sixth or seventh, so I’m coming up.”

He’s getting there, but so far hasn’t climbed the charts this year.

Comment

Comment

Changes... again

As you can see, this site looks different again. Chances are, the content on these pages is going to be a little different, too.

Since there is ample space for the baseball and other sports writing on the CSNPhilly site, there is no real need to use this space for the overflow or the ol’ shaking out the notebook jawn. Instead, this will be a more traditional, “blog.” Call it a catch all for whatever comes down the pike.

You know, for fun… you’ll see.

Comment

The annual, rambling essay on Jim Thome (and why the Phillies should get him)

Thome

It usually comes around once per baseball season that I will find a reason to write something about Jim Thome. Sometimes it's actually newsworthy, like if he had just joined a team ready to play the Phillies in the playoffs. But mostly it just has to do with the occasion of him showing up in town or appearing on the cover of a magazine.

See, it's easy to write about Jim Thome. It's easy because he's so likable and genuine. He's one of those guys that if you ask him a question, he's going to try as hard as he can to give you a good answer.

Case in point:

We were at Shea for a day game in 2003, which was Thome's first season with the Phillies. It was kind of an odd time in team history because the Phillies were supposed to be really good with guys like Pat Burrell and Bobby Abreu coming into their primes along with players like Placido Polanco and Jimmy Rollins solidifying their standings as top-shelf talent. Mix in Thome and Kevin Millwood and the sky was the limit.

The problem was the Phillies didn't quite know how to be good. Worse, the manager, Larry Bowa, liked to talk about "winning" as if it were a character trait. He seemed to believe that abrasive behavior and misplaced anger was synonymous with being a leader. He was the exact opposite of Thome because Bowa could never get out of the way of his own ego. Thome was the biggest slugger in the game during the 2003 season and he was practically ego-less. Thome thought mutual respect and a positive attitude were synonymous with being a leader and always seemed to have dozens of teammates following his every move.

Anyway, we were at Shea and I was thinking about writing a story about how Jimmy Rollins was quickly becoming a Gold Glove-caliber shortstop in the National League. This was back in the day when it was not uncommon to hang in the clubhouse after a game and rapping with Rollins about baseball and the special insight he had. Jimmy was in just his third season in the big leagues at the time and had not yet gone completely "Hollywood." See, there is a term certain old-school ball writers like to use to describe certain players who come up as happy, chatty and down-to-earth dudes, but change as soon as a little bit of fame, accolades and money comes in. It's called "going Hollywood," as in, "Barry Zito used to be really cool until he went Hollywood."

Rollins has straddled that line between regular dude and Hollywood a lot during his career, but when he was just an up-and-comer, Jimmy would demonstrate to a writer how he is able to go from an all out sprint to a sudden stop without his momentum carrying him into the outfield or ripping his ACL to shreds. He'd also explain with great detail how if given the choice between Derek Jeter, Alex Rodriguez and Nomar Garciaparra, the top American League shortstops from a decade ago, that he'd take Omar Vizquel.

Vizquel, said Rollins way back when, was the smoothest shortstop in the game. He got to everything and seemingly never in a position where he had to throw off balance or popping up from a dive. Vizquel was a shortstop's shortstop who could have been unappreciated because he was never on ESPN making some sort of dramatic play to make up for being out of position.

Back to the story...

Considering that Thome spent many years playing with Vizquel in Cleveland, I figured he would have some insight on Rollins' ability and potential. However, it's not always easy to grab a guy like Thome for a few minutes before a game. Big stars often have a lot of commitments when they play in New York City, so in order to get Thome I'd have to be quick. So when I saw him, I asked him if he had a second only to be told, "No, I'm sorry, not right now. I have to go see Ralph Kiner."

Ralph Kiner, of course, was the longtime Mets' broadcaster who led the National League in homers during his first seven years in the league. Injuries cut short his career, so Kiner hit 369 homers in 10 seasons before hanging them up after the 1955 season. If Thome had to go see Ralph Kiner, that was cool. I'd catch him some other time.

But instead, Thome walked into the bathroom/shower area in the tiny visitors' clubhouse at Shea, which led me to believe that "I gotta go see Ralph Kiner" was some sort of euphemism. As in, "Man, last night we went to some crazy Mongolian barbecue joint and now I gotta go see Ralph Kiner."

Maybe three minutes after Thome disappeared into the bathroom, I felt a tap on my shoulder. When I turned around it was Big Jim.

"Hey, come on over to my locker and we'll talk," he said.

In a baseball clubhouse, nothing like that had happened to me before or since.

Rookie ***

Stories like that make it easy to understand why Thome is so easy to write about. I'm pretty much a nobody to those guys, a smart-ass who is essentially stealing a few words from ballplayers in order to scribble short, little vignettes about a brief moment of time. To the ballplayers, any random game is one of thousands they will play in their lives, but to us it's supposed to mean more because we sat there and watched it.

Thome flipped the script. He treated everyone like they were a big shot because all of our lives crossed paths. That might sound deeper than it should, but that just might be why Thome was so revered by everyone who crossed his path. He treats everyone with basic humanity and he doesn't think he's any more important than you just because he can hit a baseball really far.

***

Here's another favorite Thome story and then we'll get to the point...
It’s a common rite in baseball circles for players to quietly ask each other for autographs, jerseys or other memorabilia. What happens is one player on an opposing team gives a shiny, new baseball to a clubbie and sends him over to the other clubhouse to have it signed by a certain player. Players love signing those baseballs, too. It’s a huge thrill to sign for another player and a true sign of respect if a peer asks for an autograph (without actually asking).

Nevertheless, it’s usually something reserved for the big-time players. Word is Cal Ripken Jr. used to make special time just to sign items from the other team. All opposing team requests had to be made before the series against Baltimore began and Ripken would honor them before the opponent left town. But that was nothing like the one request I actually witnessed with my own two eyes and ears.

Sitting with an old family friend and Red Sox old-time legend, Johnny Pesky, in the home team clubhouse at Fenway Park, ol Mr. Red Sox summoned a clubbie to fetch two brand new balls to have signed by Thome. No big deal, right? Certainly Thome was asked to sign those pearls often, even for old-timers like Pesky, who was close friends with Ted WIlliams and nearly every Red Sox player who passed through Fenway.

But no more than 10 minutes later when the clubbie returned with two signed balls from Thome along with two more clean ones with a counter request, Pesky almost lost it.

“Jim would like you to sign these for him,” the clubbie told Pesky.

Pesky took a long moment, clearly taken aback by the request. Then, exhilarated by the fact that Jim Thome had sent two baseballs to have signed, Pesky looked at the clubbie before fixing a stare on me and asked:

“Are you joking with me,” Pesky said, amazed that Thome wanted the balls signed. “Jim Thome wants me to sign these?”

He took a moment, massaged the baseballs in his weathered hands, grabbed a ballpoint pen from the clubhouse kid and signed the ball. He repeated the drill again before signing the second one, then, as if he just ran wind sprint, sat back in his chair exhilarated.

Needless to say, Pesky had the biggest smile on his face…

***

Homers The point of this exercise was to come up with a good argument why the Phillies should try to acquire Thome. The ideas were basic, like he could be a power left-handed bat off the bench or a DH in the World Series, et cetera, et cetera. But really, the only reason for getting him was completely selfish...

Thome needs two more homers to reach 600 for his career and it would be so cool if he did it for the Phillies. Actually, this was a feat we thought he was going to get for the Phillies when he signed that 8-year, $86 million deal in December of 2002. Who would have ever guessed that almost exactly three years to the day after he jumped out of a limo to greet the union guys from I.B.E.W. along Pattison Avenue that he would be traded for Aaron Rowand?

Besides, there have been a handful of stories that have hit the ether over the past few weeks about how no one really seems too excited that Thome was closing in on 600 homers. Depending upon how you judge the all-time home run list, Thome will become just the fifth or eighth man to hit 600. For the longest time the home run numbers stood at 755, 714 and 660, but thanks to chemistry and a focus on the bottom line, a few interlopers jumped into that 600-homer club.So why shouldn't baseball fans be excited?

If there is any player people should be excited about just for pulling on the uniform, it's Thome, and for those looking for a reason to expend lean tissue and time on a pro ballplayer, check out this passage from a story written by Joe Posnanski about Thome for Sports Illustrated last summer:

"I really do try hard to be a good teammate," Thome says. "I can't run very fast, but I try to always run hard. I may strike out a lot, but I try to walk to set up the guys who are hitting after me. The other day I didn't score from first on a double. I cost my guy an RBI. I felt terrible about that. I told him, 'Look, I really tried, but I'm old and I'm slow. I hope I can make it up to you in another way.'"

Teammates know he is sincere, and they love him for it. No, he can't run. He has played all of eight innings in the field (at first base) since 2007. His defense was the main reason the White Sox decided not to re-sign him. "[Manager] Ozzie [Guillen] wanted flexibility in his lineup," general manager Kenny Williams says. Guillen himself says, "Go ahead, blame me... . But I'll tell you I love Jim Thome. I wish I didn't. I wish I f------ hated the guy. But I can't hate him. Nobody can hate him."

Ex-teammates still talk about Thome lovingly in Cleveland (he does get booed a bit by Indians fans, but that's for leaving in the first place) and in Philadelphia and Chicago. He is relentlessly positive. Perkins remembers his first or second day back with the Twins this year after a long stretch in the minors. He was walking by Thome, who was taking his slow, methodical phantom batting practice. "And suddenly, he just stops," Perkins says, "and he smiles and gives me a fist. I mean, it's not like I'm Joe Mauer or Justin Morneau. He barely knows who I am. But that's the kind of guy he is. He's the best teammate I've ever had... . I think everybody thinks that."

Thome smiles in his sheepish way when the story is recounted to him. "I think you just want to be a good person," he says. "I'm getting to do what I've wanted to do my whole life. I'm getting to do what millions and millions of people would like to do."

Truth be told, I've been struggling with the "get Thome" ideas. After all, they already have Ross Gload and if there is anything the Phillies don't need it's another lefty hitter that can't play defense and must be run for if he gets on base. But then I found something I wrote about Thome in 2009 when the Dodgers picked him up just to pinch hit. Rowand, playing for the Dodgers' traditional rivals the Giants, explained why it was smart move to add Thome even if it's for just one at-bat a couple of times a week.

"Similar to the Yankees teams [Dodgers manager Joe] Torre had when [Darryl] Strawberry came off the bench. I think you’re kidding yourself if you’re a manager and he’s sitting on the bench that you don’t think twice before making a move,” Rowand said. “He’s a professional hitter – he doesn’t need four at-bats a day to stay sharp.”

Thome on the Phillies doesn’t guarantee anything. Hell, for a team counting down the magic number at the beginning of August, Thome might not even be needed in Philly even if he is a slight difference maker.

But then again, who doesn't want Jim Thome around? Better yet, with the Twins in the second division and Thome closing in on his 41st birthday, why not do the guy a favor and send him somewhere to potentially go out on top? Sure, he’d just be going up there looking to grip-and-rip at the twilight of his Hall of Fame career, but man…

What a good dude.

The game that wasn't

Wilson Note: Here's what happened... to anticipate the end of a game, we writerly types work ahead. That's how newspaper guys beat their deadlines and how us web dudes get stories online seconds after the final pitch. Needless to say, this practice can often create headaches if an unforeseen rally or comeback occurs.

In those situations it's not unusual to hear someone shout across the press box, "REWRITE!" That's actually old-timey talk, but it has a better ring to it than, "Highlight, delete!"

So on Wednesday night I had been working ahead and put together a skeleton of a story to fo as soon as the Phillies-Reds game was to end in the 10th inning. The plan was to send the story, gather some quotes and sprinkle them in while changing around some of the details that reflect the mood of the team or the scene in the clubhouse.

Since the Phillies' clubhouse is typically a ghost town after games, that leaves us with cobbling together a quote or two.

Anyway, before Ryan Howard belted a solo home run to tie the game in the 10th before it went to 19 innings and the wee hours of the morning, I came up with this story -- compare it to the one I filed after 3 a.m.

This one is about the game that never really happened.

Wednesday, May 25, 2011

By John R. Finger
CSNPhilly.com

If there is one thing the Phillies’ pitchers learned about the first three games of the four-game set is that when Jay Bruce strolls to the plate, they should run and hide.

Just run and hide.

For the second night in a row, Bruce came up in a key spot with the game on the line only to deliver a crushing base hit. Actually, in Wednesday night’s 4-3 victory over the Phillies, Bruce had two clutch hits in the late innings.

One to tie and one to win.

The game-winner was a solo homer off reliever Antonio Bastardo that barely cleared the chain-linked fence above the out-of-town scoreboard. That shot—Bruce’s 13th of the season and second of the series—was the one that sent most of the sellout crowd at the Bank scurrying for the exits.

Regardless, it was Bruce’s other big hit on Wednesday night that did the most damage.

It was a situation that Roy Halladay has been through a few times since joining the Phillies, yet always seemed to come out alright on the other side.

image from fingerfood.typepad.com With one out with the bases loaded in a two-run game and the heart of the Reds’ order due up in Wednesday night’s tilt at the Bank, Halladay was in a precarious spot, but not one that had too many folks worried. After all, this was Roy Halladay on the mound. Who cared if the Reds had already bashed out 10 hits in the seventh inning?

So after putting away cleanup hitter Scott Rolen on four pitches, Halladay got ahead quickly on Jay Bruce with three fastballs. The end was one pitch away for Halladay and the Phillies. No way was Halladay going to give up a two-run lead with two outs and two strikes on a hitter.

But Bruce wasn’t just some ordinary hitter. In fact, he may be the hottest hitter going these days. Not only did he have 13 hits and nine RBIs in his last 26 at-bats heading into that showdown against Halladay, but also clubbed a bases-loaded double with two outs in the ninth inning of a tie game just the night before.

Bruce got out in front of the two-strike changeup ever-so slightly — just enough to bounce the ball away from the grasp of second baseman Wilson Valdez and into right field for the game-tying single.

That shows just how good Bruce has been. If he can wrst away a two-run lead from Halladay, with the way he has been pitching, then maybe that run and hide advice isn't too far off.

Up next: The Phillies close out the four-game series with the Reds, as well as the nine-game homestand, on Thursday afternoon with a 1:05 p.m. start. Cliff Lee (3-4, 3.38) will take the mound against righthander Homer Bailey (3-1, 2.08).

Lee is coming off his first win in more than a month where he spun a five-hitter with 10 strikeouts in a 2-0 victory over the Texas Rangers. In eight career starts against the Reds, lee is 4-2 with a 4.69 ERA, however, last June the lefty tossed a complete-game shutout while pitching for the Mariners.

Comment

Can the Phillies afford Albert Pujols?

image from www.csnphilly.com Albert Pujols watched “The Decision,” the Lebron James made-for-TV show on ESPN in which the self-proclaimed “King” picked the Miami Heat as his free-agent destination over his hometown Cleveland Cavaliers. More than anything, Pujols took the show as a cautionary tale of what not to do.

“I’m Albert Pujols and he’s LeBron James. He thinks different and I think differently too. I would never do anything like that,” Pujols said referring to the ESPN show.

But then, Pujols said …

“Actually, let’s do a reality show!”

He was joking, of course. But then again, what if Pujols decided to turn the cameras on himself the way Barry Bondsfor ESPN during the 2006 season? Besides being the most boring reality show in history (yes, we appreciate the irony of using the terms, “boring” and “reality show”), there is only one bit of insight we’d like see in a Pujols reality gig.

Just how did Pujols react when he heard the news that his off-season workout partner, Ryan Howard, got a five-year, $125 million contract extension last April. Of course, Pujols’ interactions with Cardinals’ hitting coach Mark McGwireand manager Tony La Russa could be compelling, too, but not as much as when he learned Howard was going to get an average of $25 million per season until 2016.

Look, we don’t believe for a second that Pujols is motivated by the money. Considering he is owed $16 million for the 2011 season and took home $100 million over the last seven seasons, Pujols and his family are not going to be out on the streets anytime soon. Moreover, Pujols grew up Missouri in Independence, he is as local to St. Louis as Akron native Lebron was to Cleveland. More than anything, it should motivate the Cardinals to negotiate with Pujols in good faith.

A greedy athlete is one thing sports fans can’t stand, but a greedy beer corporation that owns the team really gets people angry—at least it should.

Nevertheless, there seemed to be some palpable anger bubbling over the edge when Howard got his megadeal, and it wasn’t so much about whether Howard deserved it. Instead, people thought if Howard is worth $125 million for five years, what will Pujols get?

So when the Phillies locked up Howard, Pujols should have been turning back flips.

If Pujols has just an average season (by his standards) in his walk year, we want to know…

Does the treasury even print that much money? 

So far the reports indicate it will take $30-35 million over 10 years to get Pujols signed to remain in St. Louis. We have to imagine that’s with the hometown discount, too.

Think about that for a second… Pujols, born on Jan. 16, 1980 (two months younger than Howard), already has 10 years of big-league service time under his belt. Let’s say if he doesn’t get bored and wants to play another 10 years to complete a contract extension, we could be looking at numbers never imagined outside of a video game. Considering that Pujols has not yet entered his athletic prime years, it’s reasonable to believe he could hit more than 800 home runs, get close to 4,000 hits with roughly 2,500 RBIs.

Sure, we can expect the inevitable drop in production, but if you haven’t figured it out already, we’re looking at one of the greatest hitters to ever play the game.

Look, it’s one thing to hear how his peers talk about him or how Hall-of-Famers like Mike Schmidt gush like a schoolgirl over his hitting prowess, approach and technique, but what about people who study money and economics for a living? 

Check out what economist J.C. Bradbury told the Chicago Tribune:

“Over the term of a 10-year contract I estimate (Pujols') average annual worth to range from $33 million to $45 million,” said J.C. Bradbury, an economist from Kennesaw State University who wrote Hot Stove Economics.

Bradbury acknowledges how tricky it is to estimate Pujols’ worth in 10 years. But he projects contracts based on a player's historical impact of winning on team revenue, aging patterns of players and league revenue growth. Having studied the effects of aging on production, Bradbury stops at age 36 because the sample size of players good enough to play into their late 30s and early 40s is too small to form conclusions.

“But Pujols is so good that even as his production drops off, he will continue to be one of the best players in the league between 38 and 42,” Bradbury predicted.

In other words, with more than 3 million tickets already sold for the 2011 season and Pujols headed for free agency, maybe Phils’ GM Ruben Amaro Jr. ought to go out on another one of his tire-kicking excursions.

Hey, what’s $400 million when the club is taking every dime out of the ballpark?

Comment

Comment

Contracts with Charlie

image from www.csnphilly.com Charlie Manuel has been in this position before. Oh yes, after two straight 90-win seasons and a division crown, Manuel felt as if he had earned a contract extension with the Indians. It made sense considering the Indians were going to rebuild around sluggers Grady Sizemore and Travis Hafner as well as pitchers CC Sabathia and Cliff Lee.

Who better to guide the team than the wildly popular hitting coach and budding manager who returned from cancer treatment to run the team with a colostomy bag tucked under his jacket?

However, Indians general manager Mark Shapiro wasn’t ready to commit to Manuel and when Big Chuck forced the issue, there was only one move the club could make…

Sorry Charlie.

“'I wanted some answers,” Manuel told The Associated Press after his firing in 2002. “I didn't want to be in limbo.”

Shapiro saw it differently. The 90-win seasons and the trip to the playoffs didn’t matter much to the GM when he saw a few years of rebuilding in the post-Jim Thome era. Sure, Shapiro wanted Charlie to stay, but during the off-season he was going to have to campaign for his job.

“I wasn't ready, in that environment, to make that commitment to Charlie,” Shapiro said in 2002. “But I feel very strongly that I wanted him to be our manager for the rest of this year and I wanted to consider him to be our long-term manager in the off-season.”

Charlie, as they say, had hand. A couple of days before he was fired, Manuel hung with then-Yankees manager Joe Torre as a coach on the American League All-Star team and was his usual, fun-loving self. If he knew he was going to push Shapiro into firing him, Manuel sure didn’t act like it.

“For a guy who was going to a meeting and probably knew what the outcome was going to be, I think Charlie felt very secure with himself those three days in Milwaukee,” Torre said in 2002. “You can only do what you do. You're confident in your own ability, and after that, it's out of your hands.”

Flash ahead nearly nine years and check out what is being said in Clearwater, Fla. Once again Manuel is in the final year of his contract, only this time he has guided the Phillies to four straight trips to the playoffs, two World Series appearances and just the franchise’s second World Series victory in 128 years.

Moreover, Manuel has the third-most wins in the modern era of any skipper in Phillies history and should move past Danny Ozark in July. He is only 102 wins behind Gene Mauch for the most in franchise history and could match the club record in two fewer seasons than Mauch.

In fact, in the modern era only two managers who have led the club for at least three seasons have a better winning percentage than Manuel and for those men who stuck around longer than three years, Big Chuck is the best.

So what’s the issue? Based on the bottom line, the Phillies have never had a more successful manager than Charlie Manuel. Add in that he is wildly popular with his players and it seems like an extension for Manuel is the easiest decision general manager Ruben Amaro Jr. will ever make. After all, Manuel only wants a two-year deal.

C’mon, two years? All this quibbling for two years?

Well, kind of…

According to Jim Salisbury, Manuel’s agent Pat Rooney aid his client wants a salary that measures with the top five skippers in the game. He is paid $2.4 million in salary this year and is reportedly looking for $4 million per season. That would put him in line with Terry Francona, Jim Leyland, Mike Scioscia, Dusty Baker and Tony LaRussa as the best-paid managers.

But does Charlie have hand? At age 67, he’s going to play out the string and perhaps find a soft consulting gig like the one Dallas Green has. Maybe the Phillies don’t view managing the Phillies as a difficult gig? After all, the team is loaded with veterans and big contracts all with something to prove after falling short of the World Series in 2010. Maybe The Amaro Gang believes anyone could do what Charlie does?

Take the situation with Davey Lopes, for instance. By all accounts, Lopes was the architect for the Phillies’ success on the base paths where they stole bases at a success rate better than most teams in baseball history. However, when Lopes was looking for a small (relatively speaking) raise for 2011, the Phillies would not budge from the prescribed salary for a first-base coach. Lopes had is offer and he could take it or leave it.

So Lopes walked.

Is that where the team is headed with Manuel? After all, the manager says he wants a contract extension in place by opening day. Past that, the contract talk could become an issue on a team devoid of controversy.

“I’ll let other people worry about whether it’s a distraction,” Amaro told Salisbury.

“It wouldn’t be the first time in the world a manager would go into a season without a contract extension. It wouldn’t trouble me. It wouldn’t trouble the players. They’re pretty focused guys. Clearly none of us want this to be distraction and I don’t think it will be. Like I said, we’d like to be able to put this to bed, so we’ll see.”

Was that in the smug font?

Either way, Manuel says that the bottom line matters the most. Of course he says this knowing he’s been in this position before.

“Once the season starts I don’t want to talk about my contract,” he said. “Hopefully something happens in spring training. I don’t want it to be a distraction for the team. I definitely put my team first. The players and how we play is how I get a contract. This is the only time I want to talk about it. I want to stay focused on the season.”

Yeah, but will he be allowed to?

Comment

1 Comment

Meanwhile, one Jerry Sloan = 14 Sixers' coaches

image from www.csnphilly.com And while the subject is on Jerry Sloan and his time served in Utah, it’s interesting to note all of the men who coached the 76ers.

Check it out: 

  • Matt Guokas: 119-88 reg. season; 8-9 playoffs
    Poor Matty Guokas had the misfortune of taking over the Sixers when former owner, Harold Katz decided to tear the team apart. Stepping up when Billy Cunningham stepped down, Guokas was on the sidelines when he took the Sixers to the Eastern Conference Finals with the last vestiges of the 1983 championship club and a youthful Charles Barkley.

    However, during the off-season where the Sixers had the No. 1 overall pick in the draft, Katz dealt the selection, which was Brad Daugherty to Cleveland for Roy Hinson. If that wasn’t bad enough, Katz then sent Moses and Terry Catledge to Washington for Cliff Robinson (the non-headbanded one) and Jeff Ruland.

    /shakes head/

    Trust me, those deals made even less sense then than they do now.

    Could you imagine a frontcourt with Daugherty, Moses, young Sir Chuck with Catledge as the sixth man and Mo Cheeks and Hersey Hawkins in the backcourt?

    Sigh!

    Poor Matty Guokas never had a chance.

  •  Jim Lynam: 194-173 reg. season; 8-13 playoffs
    Before he was the man on Sixers’ Post-Game Live, Lynam was one of a hanful of men to win an Atlantic Division title for the Sixers. In fact, since Lynam took the 1989-90 club to the Atlantic crown, the team has won the division just one time.
  •  

  •  Doug Moe: 19-37 reg. season
    Mulligan!
  •  

  •  Fred Carter: 32-76 reg. season
    Not only was Mad Dog a member of the historic 1972 Sixers, he also was on hand to witness the beginning of theShawn Bradley Era.
  •  

  •   John Lucas: 42-122 reg. season
    The Sixers, amazingly, took a step backwards during Lucas’ reign. However, thanks to Lucas’ deft touch, the Sixers were in position to draft Jerry Stackhouse and Allen Iverson.
  •  

  •  Johnny Davis: 22-60 reg. season
    Davis’ claim to fame in his only season with the club was that he was in the backcourt for Portland when they beat the Sixers in the 1977 NBA Finals. Oh, and he also allowed rookie Iverson to shoot the ball as much as he wanted.
  •  

  • Larry Brown: 255-205 reg. season; 28-30 playoffs
    The Hall-of-Famer has coached 13 different teams since 1972, yet managed to stay the longest in Philadelphia. He also figured out how to coax an Eastern Conference title after facing two Game 7s in the playoffs. Fun and crazy times…
  •  

  •  Randy Ayers: 21-31 reg. season
    Mulligan! You get two of those, right?
  •  

  • Chris Ford: 12-18 reg. season
    Ford was just the interim coach, but he quickly butted heads with Iverson. Apparently Iverson was not impressed that Ford made the very first three-pointer in NBA history.
  •  

  • Jim O’Brien: 43-39 reg. season; 1-4 playoffs
    O’Brien has been fired by the Celtics, Sixers and Pacers. He got the axe in Boston because he clashed with GM Danny Ainge and wanted to keep Tony Battie and Eric Williams instead of rebuilding the roster with Kevin Garnett and Ray Allen. He got fired in Philly because he wasn’t Mo Cheeks and then he got fired in Indiana because he didn’t win.
  •  

  •  Mo Cheeks: 113-133 reg. season; 2-4 playoffs
    Cheeks was around for the rise and fall of the great Sixers’ teams of the 1970s and ‘80s, and was there for the end of the Iverson Era. He’s the greatest point guard in franchise history and maybe even the most well-liked guy, too.
  •  

  •  Tony DiLeo: 32-27 reg. season; 1-4 playoffs
    DiLeo came down from the front office when Cheeks was fired, pushed the team back into the playoffs and then went back to his old gig when the season was over. Went out with a winning record…

     

  •  Eddie Jordan: 27-55 reg. season
    Wait… we’re out of mulligans? OK, fore!
  •  

  • Doug Collins: 24-28 reg. season
    Let’s see where this goes…

    So that’s 14 coaches and one Finals appearance in the time Sloan spent in Utah. Interestingly, Utah has had just three coaches since moving from New Orleans.

  • 1 Comment

    Comment

    Early Call: Doug Collins coach of the year

    image from www.csnphilly.com It’s still relatively early in the NBA season to be discussing the post-season awards with any kind of alacrity. Sure, fans are chanting “M-V-P!” at Amare Stoudemire in Madison Square Garden, but really, what do they know?

    Regardless, with the 76ers checking in with a 24-27 record a week before the All-Star break, the trendy pick for coach of the year is Doug Collins. Considering the Sixers are 21-14 since their slow start to the season, Collins and the gang have done something right. Shoot, Collins could be coach of the year just for getting folks to start talking about the 76ers again.

    What will it be like if the Sixers really start winning again?

    Anyway, Collins as the NBA coach of the year — yes, it’s premature — is an interesting addition to his resume. Though he coached two different 50-win teams in the past and got to the Eastern Conference Finals with the 1988-89 Bulls, Collins’ clubs have always been seen by most as underachievers. But then again that’s kind of the way it is when a team with Michael Jordan doesn’t win it all.

    Still, it was interesting reading Collins’ comments on how things have gone in his return to Philadelphia after the Sixers ripped the Hawks on Tuesday night. Noting that a lot of folks cringed or did a silent full-body dry heave when Collins informed them he was taking the Sixers’ gig, the season has been a rousing success…

    So far.

    From Shaun Powell and NBA.com:

    “Well, I've come full circle, back to the place where I began my career as a player, and now I'm at my final stop as a coach,” he said. “And there's no better place to be than Philadelphia, where they appreciate basketball and deserve a winner. And it's my job and my goal to make that happen.”

    He added: “This has gone better than I ever imagined.”

    Collins, too, has been better than some had imagined, too. Again, it’s just 51 games with No. 52 coming tonight at the Center against the Magic, but Collins, at 60, could be more mature than his previous stops in the league with the Bulls, Pistons and Wizards. The difference though could be that those teams were expected to win and challenge for the NBA title while the Sixers were (and are) viewed as a work-in-progress.

    Collins told Powell he has a better perspective.

    “I'm different now, as a person and a coach,” he said. “When I started in Chicago I'd never been a coach before, on any level. I'm more at ease. Look, I'm as competitive as the next person. I want to win badly every time we step on the floor. But I do like to put the foundation in place, to make the team better than what it was when I got it. And this is one of those situations.”

    We’ll see where it goes from here, but so far it’s tough not to be impressed by Collins’ work. Perhaps even he can add coach of the year into an impressive resume that includes Olympian, No. 1 draft pick and four-time NBA All-Star.

    Comment

    Comment

    We're still here...

    Scorpio For the more astute of you (or maybe the few that actually pay attention to this sort of thing) this site looks a little different. By that, of course, I mean it isn’t teeming with odd little stories and half-baked theories.

    Half-baked being the most fun way to theorize, of course.

    Others may have noticed the spate of posts under the banner Word on the Street on the CSNPhilly.com site and probably assumed that this one was on the way out. That only seems logical, right? There are only so many hours in the day.

    Here’s the thing… I have an firm affection for this site and have an unnatural affinity for it even though it’s not even a person or a thing. It’s just a bunch of words piled on top of each other in attempt to tell some sort of a story.

    In other words, Finger Food isn’t going anywhere. Its focus might shift and the posts might come at a slower rate, but it isn’t going anywhere at all.

    That said, let this serve as notice that the posts won’t be published at the same rate as in the past. There is a lot going on with my taking over the Word on the Street jawn and that doesn’t even include a project that is loosely related to this site.

    So hang tight, good people. We have some changes forthcoming and hopefully the site remains as fun for you as it is for me.

    xoxoxoxo,
    jrf

    Comment

    Werth is determined, not bitter

    Werth

    WASHINGTON — Let’s not get it twisted, Jayson Werth is not bitter. Who gets bitter about signing a $126 million, no-trade contract? In this economy and with the unemployment rate near 10 percent, Werth can work for seven more years before cashing out. In fact, with the right money manager, Werth’s young children can retire, too.

    Bitter? C’mon… he’s not stupid. Early on during the 2010 season Werth told us he was going to test the free-agent market and go for the best deal out there and that’s exactly what he did. Werth wanted to get paid like his former teammates Ryan Howard, Chase Utley, Roy Halladay and the rest of the players on the Phillies who were taken care of by management. Instead, he had to go somewhere else for that big contract.

    The Phillies reportedly had just a three-year deal worth $16 million per season for him when Werth hit the open market.

    Nevertheless, Werth is also a pretty competitive dude. No one gets to the big leagues and slugs 13 postseason home runs by accident or by tricking people. Moreover, not many ballplayers accomplish what Werth has so soon after his career was nearly over.

    So if you want to know what this is all about, it’s the injury. It’s the sitting at home during the 2006 season with nobody knocking at the door or ringing the phone. It’s about the misdiagnosis of a wrist injury that forced Werth out of desperation to trudge up to Minnesota and the Mayo Clinic with one last chance to save his career. A person can almost hear music in Werth’s voice when he describes how specialist Dr. Richard Berger figured out the injury was a ulnotriquetral ligament split.

    He hasn’t been the same since.

    Yes, that’s why Werth took the seven years from lowly Washington instead of the three from Philadelphia.

    “A lot of blood, sweat and tears went into this,” Werth said. “Obviously the years were important to me. The chance to come to a city, guaranteed to be here for a long time, the no-trade was a big deal for me. I have a chance to set my family up for years to come here.”

    It’s hard to fault a guy for thinking like that. However, Werth is not without his pride. Baseball is his job for goshsakes. Sure it’s fun and a remarkable way to make an obscene amount of money, but Werth isn’t messing around out there. He wants to perform well, win games and celebrate at the end of the season. Looking for examples? OK, how about when he hit that home run against the Yankees in the World Series at the Bank, slammed his bat down and yelled into the Phillies’ dugout?

    Or what about Game 4 of the 2008 World Series when Werth hit a homer in the eighth inning and circled the bases with a fist in the air. He looked as if he could feel the championship ring being placed on his finger right then. Of course there was that incident with the kid and his father in right field last year, too… didn’t they know Werth thought he could stretch into the stands beyond his reach to catch a foul ball? Didn’t they know ballplayers use those types of words when things don’t go their way?

    If anything, the pride aspect of Werth’s personality is what makes the move to Washington puzzling even when factoring in the $126 million. That’s especially so when listening to him speak on Wednesday afternoon at his new ballpark.

    “I’ve been in the postseason a lot the last couple of years,” he said. “That’s what it’s all about. That’s what you play for. That’s what you work out for. That's what you get to spring training early for. I hate to lose. I’m here to win.”

    That task didn’t seem so daunting when Werth first signed the deal. After all, the Phillies were basically the same team that fell short in 2010 minus their everyday right fielder. Then the Cliff Lee thing happened and everything changed.

    “They got their boy back, I guess,” Werth said. 

    Yes they did and it wasn’t Jayson Werth. Instead he was allowed to run off much like Aaron Rowand, a player who signed with San Francisco for a lot of years and a lot of dollars because the view from management was that his stats were enhanced by Citizens Bank Park and the Phillies’ lineup. Maybe that’s where the twinge of bitterness might come in for Werth.

    No, he wasn’t double-crossed, but he wasn’t really needed, either.

    That’s not the case in Washington, though. Instead, GM Mike Rizzo submitted on nearly every point to Werth and his agent Scott Boras. From the Nats, Werth got big money, a huge length of the contract and a no-trade clause on top of it all with promises of more players to come. Actually, the undercurrent from the Nats’ view was that Werth was the first one onboard and the one who gives them credibility with other potential ballplayers.

    That’s the sense “No Discounts” Boras gets, too.

    “When Jayson signed, the first thing (players) all asked me was, ‘Oh, so Washington's stepping up? They’re taking those steps? They’re looking to win now?’” Boras said. “In the player community, when you gain that kind of street credit, you have taken a huge step as far as what players will look at your organization, and how they’ll look at it differently.”

    It’s not going to happen overnight, though, but Werth hammered home the theme that promises were made.

    “The thing about this team is, I think there's some pieces of the puzzle that could be put together and make this team a winner,” Werth said. “I was assured by the Lerner family and Mike Rizzo that they’re going to take steps needed to go get those players and fill the roster accordingly—not with just anybody, but the right-talented guy and the right mix, the person that will make the clubhouse a good place. That was important to me, and that was one of the things that led me to sign here.”

    No, that doesn’t sound like a bitter guy at all. Actually, it sounds like a guy with a lot of pride and a hunger to lift the Nats to the top of the standings.

    “He doesn’t like losing. I certainly don’t like losing,” Rizzo said. “My job is to put a winner on the field, and we’re hell-bent on doing that.”

    It’s not going to be easy, though. After all, Jayson Werth can’t pitch.

    Does Cliff Lee make the Phillies one of the best teams ever?

    Lee_phils There was a stretch last September where the Phillies went on a run to cripple the rest of the NL East, winning 11 games in a row and 22 of 26 in which the team showed glimpses of something otherworldly. It was thanks to that streak that the Phillies erased a seven-game deficit in the standings and turned it into a seven-game advantage faster than one could say, “The Big Three.”

    Led by the starting rotation made up of aces Roy Halladay, Cole Hamels and Roy Oswalt, most of the players in the clubhouse were playing for the best team ever. At least that’s what they said.

    “Definitely. We’re better all around – less question marks. Not that question marks ever bothered us because we like to prove skeptics wrong, but coming into this year there were only one or two things people were iffy about,” said Jimmy Rollins, the longest tenured player on the team. “Then we had a great acquisition in little Roy [Oswalt] and that took the pressure off of Cole [Hamels], and then Roy [Halladay] took the pressure off of everybody. He just came in and shut the door. Lights out.”

    Still, it’s tough to label the team the best ever if it didn’t win the championship, and despite a postseason where the pitching staff posted a 2.37 ERA, got 80 strikeouts in 79 2/3 innings and had two shutouts, a near shutout, and a no-hitter, the ending was quite disappointing.

    So rather than keep Jayson Werth on an offense that was frustratingly maddening during the season and playoffs, general manager Ruben Amaro Jr. did the next logical move and backed up a Brinks’ truck on Cliff Lee’s front lawn. Apparently the Phillies plan for 2011 is if they aren’t going to score many runs, then the other team isn’t going to score any...

    At all.

    And that’s just it, isn’t it? The Phillies intend on flirting with history in 2011 and to do so they have replaced Cy Young Award winners Cliff Lee and Pedro Martinez with Oswalt and Lee (again). In fact, the motto for the Phillies hitters in the coming season might be, “One and done.” After all, on most nights they probably can get by with just one run.

    But is this the best pitching staff in team history, let alone recent baseball history? Baring an injury there is a chance the quartet could become just the third group in baseball history to have four 20-game winners on the same staff. Only the 1971 Orioles with Dave McNally (21-5), Pat Dobson (20-8), Jim Palmer (20-9) and Mike Cuellar (20-9) as well as the 1920 White Sox with Red Faber (23-13), Lefty Williams (22-14), Dickie Kerr (21-9) and Ed Ciciotte (21-10) have accomplished the feat.

    However, neither team won the World Series.

    So yes, for history to judge the Phillies most favorably, they have to win.

    After all, does anyone remember much about the Oakland teams that went to the postseason in four straight seasons but never made it past the ALDS? How about the Indians of the 1990s that made it the playoffs for five seasons in a row and the World Series twice, but never wore the ring?

    Of course there are also the Braves that dominated divisional play for 14 years in a row, but have just one title—against the Indians in ’95—to show for it.

    Going back a bit, the Orioles made it to the World Series three years in a row (1969, 1970, 1971), but won it once. The same thing happened with Oakland in 1988, 1989 and 1990. Those teams are remembered as dynasties that might have been had it been able to finish the deal.

    Are the Phillies worried about how history might judge them?

    “You play this game to try and win championships and that’s our focus,” Ryan Howard said toward the end of the 2010 season. “We stay focused on the task at hand and let you guys tell us where it fits into the history books. That will sort itself out.”

    Phillies 3 The collating process might be a little simpler with Lee and maybe the “wow” factor engulfing the baseball world will lend itself to a few victories. Still, has Amaro assembled the best foursome ever? Just how does this group compare with the Braves of 1998 where five pitchers (Maddux, Glavine, Smoltz, Millwood and Neagle) won at least 17 games? What about the 1966 Dodgers with Sandy Koufax, Don Drysdale, Don Sutton and Claude Osteen that posted a 2.68 ERA in 1,062 innings averaging 7.1 strikeouts per nine innings? The ’66 Dodgers had three Hall of Famers while the ’98 Braves have three pitchers that should be in as soon as they are eligible.

    Then there was the 1954 Indians with its trio of Hall of Famers in Early Wynn, Mike Garcia, Bob Lemon and Bob Feller that compiled 77 complete games and 12 shutouts on the way to 111 wins… do the 2011 Phillies fit in with those great teams?

    Maybe, but the Phillies hope not. Why… because none of those teams won the World Series. In fact, the Indians and Dodgers got swept and the Braves never got there. Of course there is the alternative, too, which is a flat-out flop. The teams that come to mind in the flop category are the 2007 and 2008 Mets who went out and got Johan Santana to lead a rotation comprised of Glavine, Pedro, Oliver Perez and John Maine only to collapse, titanically, before reaching the finish line.

    Also, there are many Yankees teams that tried to buy a championship with pitching only to fall flat, which is the risk the Phillies are faced with now. With two of the highest paid pitchers in baseball history followed by two past NLCS MVPs, one of whom is heading into his free agent year, the Phillies have plenty of pressure piling up this season.

    And then, of course, there is history to tend with, too.

    Why was Cliff Lee traded in the first place?

    Cliff_lee There was a casual moment before a game in New York last season where general manager Ruben Amaro Jr., while shooting the breeze with a few writers, mused on last December’s trade that sent Cliff Lee to the Seattle Mariners for a gaggle of supposed prospects.

    “According to some people,” Amaro said jokingly, “it was the dumbest trade ever.”

    The response to that was, “Well, not the dumbest.”

    Sure, it was a light moment and everyone had a good chuckle, but it underscored the one theme of the 2010 season that never went away…

    Just how could anyone trade Cliff Lee?

    Certainly there was plenty of grumbling about the media and the fans fascination with Lee after he was dealt away only to resurface in Texas where he led the Rangers to the World Series for the first time in club history. Shoot, even while reveling in the glory of Roy Halladay’s no-hitter in the playoffs, senior advisor Dallas Green said the moment gave the Phils’ brass a chance to "go wild."

    “We forgot about Cliff Lee,” Green said.

    That didn’t last too long, though. Lee didn’t let anyone forget about him by tearing through the first two rounds of the playoffs with performances that topped even the greatness he put together with the Phillies in 2009. In his first 24 innings, Lee racked up 34 strikeouts and allowed just two runs. He made it very hard on Phillies fans even though no one was unhappy about their team. How could anyone be upset about replacing Lee with Halladay and Roy Oswalt?

    Still, there was something about Lee. He was as cool pitching for the Rangers as he was in 2009. Unflappable might be the best word because he never, ever changed his approach or his routine. He still ran on and off the field, still pantomimed a throw into center field from behind the mound before he began to warm up before an inning, and still threw that low 90s-mph fastball.

    How cool was Lee? While most pitchers cocooned their arms in ice after games, Lee showered, dressed and was gone. He didn’t treat his arm with ice like most pitchers. Even after a career-high 272 innings pitched (counting the playoffs) in ‘09, Lee never strapped his arm in an ice pack after a game. In 16 of his 39 starts Lee pitched into the eighth inning. He averaged 104 pitches per start and hardly walked anyone.

    And then he got even better. Better yet, Lee got so good that the New York Yankees and the millions they offered at him wasn’t enough. Apparently Lee wants to win, too, and there was no other place he wanted to do it than Philadelphia.

    What in the name of Scott Rolen is going on here?

    Strangely, the Phillies now have Halladay and Lee. They have Roy Oswalt and Cole Hamels, too, while the comparisons to the Braves of the 1990s and Orioles of the early 1970s roll in. Actually, the talk is that the rotation that Amaro somehow put together could be the greatest ever, and that’s not just in Philadelphia where Connie Mack put together some strong teams in the first half of the last century. Instead people are talking about the top four starters as the greatest ever in baseball. Of course they have to win it first—win it all, not just get there—but the resume is nothing to sneeze at.

    Amongst the Fab Four, there are three Cy Young Awards, two MVPs in the NLCS, one in the World Series, six 20-win seasons and 13 All-Star Game appearances. Already we’re talking about whether the Phillies can have three 20-game winners on the staff, a feat not pulled off in the big leagues since Oakland did it in 1973 with Ken Holtzman, Vida Blue and Catfish Hunter. Meanwhile, a team has had four 20-game winners on a team just twice in history (1920 White Sox, 1971 Orioles).

    Incidentally, the Phillies were the first team to have three 20-game winners on the same team when the second-place 1901 club did it, but then again that they carried just six pitchers all season.

    Nevertheless, the Lee deal begs the question as to why he even had to be traded at all. Was the 363 days spent in the American League really necessary or was it something that needed to happen in order for everyone to understand just how valuable pitching is? More importantly, with Oswalt headed into the final year of his current deal, is the fearsome foursome just a one-year rocket ship headed for October or will Amaro be able to find the cash to keep it together?

    Don’t tell us that they will have to trade Oswalt only to bring him back after a season in the wilderness.

    Whatever happens, 2011 is going to be pressure-packed and fun to watch. Halladay, Lee, Oswalt and Hamels have to win it, don’t they? Anything short of another WFC has to be considered a failure, right?

    Is this what it feels like for Yankees and Red Sox fans, too?

    Anyway, there was a valuable lesson learned since last Dec. 16 when Lee was sent packing and it is, give up on Lee at your peril. The Yankees couldn’t swing a deal for him at the deadline last July and paid for it during the regular-season and the playoffs. Tampa Bay could have used Lee, too, but in the end he beat them twice in the postseason. Halladay and Oswalt were spectacular during the second half of the season, but if Amaro thought for a second that the offense would be outdone by the Giants’ in the NLCS, do you think he would have given up on Cliff Lee?

    They Giants won the World Series with a rookie, Pat Burrell and Aubrey Huff in the middle of their batting order and that just ain’t right.

    Maybe the better question is just what was it about Lee that keeps folks in Philly talking? After all, Lee arrived at the end of July in 2009 and was gone by the second week of December. That’s not a long time at all and yet it’s a wonder an impromptu parade down Broad Street didn’t break out when news of his reacquisition hit like wild fire.

    Yes, Lee is back only this time it has to be better than before.