Comment

Clerical things

Hi folks... we're still playing around with formats and ideas here at Finger Food and CSNPhilly.com, but in the meantime here are a few updates: My personal Twitter site remains the same. It's there. I update it. Sometimes it's good, other times it's boring. You know... like life. Anyway, if you want to know where I am at every single minute, hire a private dick. If you want to know what I think about, say, The Wrestler, within 140 characters, then, yes, my Twitter page is for you.

Also, we set up Twitter pages for all sorts of things at CSNPhilly.com. Here's what we have so far...

CSNPhilly: http://twitter.com/CSNPhilly

The Phillies: http://twitter.com/Phillies_Alert

The Flyers: http://twitter.com/Flyers_Alert

The Sixers: http://twitter.com/Sixers_Alert

You know... follow along. It will be fun.

Also, check back tonight for a new story. I'll have something after I do some thinkin'.

Comment

Comment

The easy money

President Obama was in Peoria, Ill. on Thursday to discuss the woeful state of the economy at a Caterpillar plant. There, the heavy machine manufacturer in Jim Thome’s hometown and the former employer of Chuck Thome, Jim’s dad, for 40 years, announced that it was going to cut 22,000 jobs.

Chuck Thome retired as manager for Caterpillar in 1993 and no doubt knows some of the people who will be affected by the job cuts… and then some.  Actually, those job losses could change just about everything about the town where Jim Thome grew up and first learned how to hit a baseball. The Peoria the Thomes knew might never exist again.

After all, in Washington, D.C. on Friday afternoon, Obama’s press secretary Robert Gibbs gave an answer to a question that had to make folks in Peoria shudder. Even if the President’s stimulus bill works, there was no guarantee that Caterpillar’s CEO Jim Owens would hire back any of the 22,000 folks whose jobs disappeared.

Just like that they could be gone forever as if picked up and carried away by a soft breeze.

“He's not saying, ‘I'm going to rehire U.S. employees or even Peoria employees,’ ” said Rick Doty, president of the United Auto Workers Local 974, which represents thousands of Caterpillar workers.

To call these tough times doesn’t quite describe how rough things are for regular Americans.

Meanwhile, a little farther south from the White House, another press briefing was taking place. And in an indirect way this presser had something to do with the economic stimulus. At least it did to Ryan Howard, who met the press for the first time since signing a three-year, $54 million contract.

So for that first press conference Howard came adorned with shiny diamond earrings the size of hubcaps and some bling on his wrist that could cause carpal tunnel. While the rest of the country struggles, Howard is flush. Over the next three years he will take home a little more than $111,111 per game. That’s a figure more than twice the amount of the average household income ($50,233) in the U.S. in 2007, according to the U.S. Census.

Yes, for one game, Howard will get nearly twice the pay that the average American family brings home in a year of going to work every day.

Not bad work if you can find it. But then again it seems as if any work is good work if folks can find it.

Continue reading this story ...

Comment

Comment

The good (old) swimsuit issue

I don't get out much. Reading some of these missives ought to make that obvious. Really, think about it... I write about sports (exclusively), get to a ballgame or a hundred every year and live in Lancaster, Pa.

Nope, not much happening here.

But even a sheltered dude like me knows old-fashioned when he sees it and this time it was shoved through the mail slot in my door. So when I walked over to pick up the pile of magazines and junk mail on the ground, I saw Bar Refaeli staring coquettishly from behind a bank statement.

But rather than going for the rather flimsy-feeling magazine, I went for the bank statement. After all, in this age the fact that the bank is actually telling me I have money is the biggest turn-on.

Bar Refaeli?

Yawn...

Look, as one of those so-called red-blooded Americans, I like half-naked women as much as the next person. Think about it... what else do Americans really do well any more. There's all-you-can-eat buffets; spiraling, out-of-control credit debt; and scantily clad men and women. That's us.

U-S-A! U-S-A!

But c'mon, the Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue? In 2009? Really?

Read the rest of this story...

Comment

Comment

Making the rounds

While trying to wrap our little minds about all that's gone on recently (as well as with what is about to come), perhaps it's a good idea to dive into a hodgepodge of stories hitting the wires today. Before doing that, however, it's only fair to point out that Peter Gammons of ESPN acknowledged his shortcomings during his interview with Alex Rodriguez. And unlike Rodriguez, Gammons was explicit when offering his mea culpa in an e-mail interview with the popular web site, Deadspin.

Gammons wrote:

I think in retrospect, I should have interrupted the Arod rant. My first question asked if Selena's story were true, he essentially admitted it was, and I believed she was therefore vindicated. I usually don't get into grudges, and felt he was promoting her book, which will be her response. I was trying to get Alex in his own words, but Jeff's criticism has merit that I accept.

So, with Gammons falling on the proverbial sword, it's only fair to retract my criticisms of the ol' ballscribe from Tuesday's little rant on the A-Roid situation and the ESPN interview. Most people (journalists especially) have difficulty admitting mistakes, so if someone of Gammons' stature can admit that he wasn't his best, well, I guess it's even more fair to acknowledge the professionalism and grace.

So there.

Continue reading the rest of this story...

Comment

Comment

There's nothing to take

What a crazy week, huh? Maybe we ought to just call it a party week or something. After all, every element was in place - illicit drugs, controlled substances, big-time money and contracts, controversy, buses, general weirdness and of course, apologies.

Lots and lots of apologies.

In fact, before I get too deep into this I ought to offer a pre-emptive apology for the things I did even though I don't know what they are. So yeah, sorry.

And thanks to Alex Rodriguez for setting that trend. Or was it Jason Giambi? Either way it was a Yankee, a team that has proven that it is not above saying sorry. Actually, with Giambi, Andy Pettitte, Roger Clemens, Gary Sheffield, and now A-Roid, the Yankees just might be the place to go for the *really* good drugs.

But we digress.

"The truth will set you free," Rodriguez told a very demure and gentle Peter Gammons of ESPN in a very soft interview. "I'm just proud I'm here sharing my story."

That's what A-Roid said, anyway. Did he really share his story or did he try to shift the blame like Donovan McNabb is said to have done earlier in the week when he pointed out that he gave the defense a lead late in the fourth quarter of the NFC Championship. In normal times even the most mundane statement from McNabb is big news in these parts. Heck, McNabb could say, "Boo!" on Halloween and it would be immediately uploaded onto web sites across the region in a newfangled "stop the presses!" moment.

Not this time. Not when the President of the United States is asked during a prime-time news conference about A-Roid when he was supposed to be answering questions about the economic stimulus bill. Really, that's how big this is.

Really?

Continue reading the rest of this story...

Comment

Comment

No surprises here

It’s ridiculous, frankly. All of the hand wringing and dramatic anger about a report of a flunked drug test by one of baseball’s biggest names is beyond silly. It’s really as schlocky as the overwrought acting in a soap opera.

Call it Dynasty with A-Roid.

Or maybe “Dynasty” is the wrong soap for Alex Rodriguez to star in considering his teams have never won jack.

Anyway, perhaps it’s beyond cynical to not be surprised that the reports of a famous athlete allegedly tested positive for performance-enhancing drugs. Even guys who try to cultivate their image yet still make it so hard to for folks to like them like A-Rod fail to surprise. When the Sports Illustrated story surfaced reporting Rodriguez failed a drug test during his 2003 MVP season with the Texas Rangers, I almost yawned. Then again, who doesn’t slow down in traffic when passing a car crash? That’s certainly what we had here.

Yet A-Rod isn’t the typical wreck, apparently. Bob Costas doesn’t breathlessly indulge scribes on the tee-vee like he did on the MLB Network on Saturday for a fender bender. A-Rod mixed with methenolone, reportedly the same drug Barry Bonds tested positive for, is big news.

So why the cynicism?

Easy. It’s easy. They make it easy. When we’ve all been burned by the truth way too many times, cynicism might be the only ride left.

It’s kind of like the time when I was a teenager and spent two weeks during a summer working in one of my grandfather’s restaurants. I would never eat there, I told people, because “I saw what went on in the kitchen.” Though, to be fair, the place was ridiculously clean, it’s just that the basic act of food preparation is, in its essence, messy.

Continue reading this story...

Comment

3 Comments

Brand's injury conjures (bad) memories

Twenty years ago it was a foot and not a shoulder that spoiled a Sixers’ big man and gave reams of fodder to sporting press in Philadelphia. Though the team had Charles Barkley rumbling into his prime and Julius Erving in his final season, the 1986-87 season ended with barely a whimper in the first round of the playoffs. Those Sixers were a doughnut team that was moving into a transitional period. There were a few decent seasons left and some short-lived playoff runs, but for the most part the glory days were gone.

Maybe it all started with one bad step.

Whatever it was, Jeff Ruland’s brittle foot was in the middle of it.

Ruland, of course, had the misfortune of getting injured before joining a team in Philadelphia. As a result, the fans and media didn't get a chance to see what he could do. In some sense, the same could be said for Danny Tartabull and Freddy Garcia in following years.

To be fair, it wasn’t Ruland’s fault. A first-round pick out of Iona in 1980, Ruland was hulking presence in the middle for the post-Wes Unseld/Elvin Hayes Washington Bullets. In his first four seasons with the Bullets, Ruland, now a coach with the Sixers, led the league in minutes once and rated in the top 10 in foul shots, rebounds and field-goal percentage. He went to an All-Star Game and had it not been for Buck Williams and Isiah Thomas, he might have been the NBA’s Rookie-of-the-Year in 1981.

But midway through his fourth season with the Bullets, Ruland broke his foot and played in just 37 games. The next season (1985-86), lingering foot and knee trouble limited Ruland to just 30 games for the Bullets before the big trade.

On draft day in June of 1986, the 76ers traded away the No. 1 overall pick in the draft (which was five-time All-Star Brad Daugherty) to Cleveland for Roy Hinson and then shipped away Moses Malone and Terry Catledge for Cliff Robinson and Ruland.

Actually, the Sixers got just Cliff Robinson in the Malone/Catledge trade because Ruland played just five games during the 1986-87 season before the injuries forced him to retire. Just like that and the bruising big man was washed up at 28.

Four years later Ruland attempted a comeback with the Sixers, but that lasted just 13 games before a bizarre Achilles injury outside the Boston Garden involving a luggage cart and a Celtics’ employee ended his return.

Apparently, Ruland just wasn’t meant to play for the Sixers.

Could history be repeating itself two decades later?

Man, the Sixers hope not.

“It’s a huge blow to the team,” coach Tony DiLeo understated.

Certainly the circumstances are different with All-Star Elton Brand than they were with Ruland. Brand will miss the rest of the 2008-09 season after getting through a bunch more games (29) than Ruland did two decades ago. Plus, Brand injured his shoulder with a hard fall to the hardwood. This is just the latest in injuries for Brand who missed nearly all of last season after having Achilles surgery.

Nevertheless, Brand and Ruland can get together to commiserate.

“It’s the most disappointed I’ve ever been in my career,” Brand said. “This was supposed to be special. This was supposed to be winning. This was supposed to be fun. I’m still not going to let them down. I know what it takes. I still have it inside me to do it.”

But ultimately, losing Brand is a bigger hit to the team than it was when Ruland went out. For one thing, Ruland wasn’t expected to be the main piece of the team when he arrived to replace Moses. Plus, Ruland played in a different era of the NBA where the economics weren’t as restricting. For his five games, Ruland got $860,000 – not a small chunk of change, but mere tip money in the modern NBA.

Meanwhile, Brand is not only the centerpiece of the revamped Sixers’ roster filled with up-and-comers, but he’s also an anchor on the Sixers’ salary cap for the next five seasons whether or not he plays again. That’s $13.7 million this season followed by steady raises to 2013 when Brand will be 34 for a cool, $80 million.

“I just wish I could do it right away,” Brand said of his upcoming shoulder surgery. “The fans, they still haven’t seen me play healthy yet, so it is disappointing.”

It’s too early to know if Brand’s time as a Sixer will mirror Ruland’s. Besides, sports medicine, training and rehabilitation has advanced light years since Ruland broke his foot in the mid-1980s.

“I’ve heard some people say, ‘Is he injury prone?’ Well, I guess I have to get the dictionary out,” general manager Ed Stefanski said. “From the replay, I don’t see. I’m prejudiced obviously, but for a guy to bring down an NBA player full force on his shoulder is not injury prone.”

Yes, that’s true. A hard fall in the heat of an NBA game doesn’t necessarily make a guy a perennial injury risk and it’s very unlikely that Brand’s career is anywhere close to being over.

But none of that helps the Sixers this year.

3 Comments

Comment

Manny of the people

mannyGood for Manny Ramirez. Good for him for standing up to the power structure in Major League Baseball and telling them, "You think you can buy me with $25 million? Ha!" "Ha!" he says.

So yes, kudos to Manny Ramirez for not allowing the Los Angeles Dodgers to reduce him to a dollar sign. There's more to Manny than the money, like... well... he's good at hitting a baseball and he has a unique hair style. Yeah. Not everyone can hit a baseball or grow interesting hair, so Manny has that going for him.

Which is nice.

So why is the fearsome right-handed hitter trivialized with dollar signs? Why do they insist on turning the great game of baseball like it's some sort of business?

Manny is an artist and he's above such trite things like contacts and millions and millions of dollars. He just wants to play the game and show off his skills. He wants to entertain and dazzle us with his pure swing.

Twenty-five million dollars? Who has time to be bothered by such trivial non-sense?

Manny's agent Scott Boras knows this. It's a good thing the hitter has someone like Boras on his side looking out for his best interests, too. After all, could Manny fend off those jackals in those sharp suits and sensible shoes working for the Dodgers who want to give him $25 million to play baseball in 2009? Probably not. The way those guys throw around money and push and bully hardworking folks like Manny around, it's a wonder he doesn't wake up next to a horse head.

So when the Dodgers came calling with the contract and a Brinks truck, Boras just laughed. Maybe he chuckled. He definitely guffawed. Later, he smirked just thinking about the nerve of those suit-wearing folks in the executive offices in Chavez Ravine. C'mon, $25 million? If Boras was getting a 10 percent cut of his client's cash, that left a mere $2.5 million.

Really...the nerve!

But let's try this one out for size - maybe Manny is a revolutionary. Maybe he is looking out for the proletariat. You know, the hard-working, lunch-pail middle American. And so to show solidarity with the backbone of America, Manny, a son of immigrants who grew up in Manhattan's hard-scrabble Washington Heights section, proves he can't be bought.

Twenty-five million dollars? Go fly a kite.

Boras, in a conversation with the LA Times, called the $25 million offer a, "Suggestion." In fact, it was an even bigger slap in the face than the two-year, $45 million offer the Dodgers sent to Manny in November.

It's as if the Dodgers and the rest of the franchises in Major League Baseball are trying to tell Manny something. At least that's what his pal Albert Pujols said during a press conference last week.

"I speak with Manny every three days and he tells me, 'Man, no one wants to sign me,' Pujols said. "I'm not an agent or general manager, but I can't understand how Manny has not signed."

Boras says he expects to have a deal in place by the time spring training camps open on Feb. 14, which will further stoke the speculation. Will the Mets wade into the fray despite the fact that the team's brass say publically that they aren't interested? Hey, why not? Manny is from New York so it could be a sweet little homecoming for him. Better yet, Newsday's Wallace Matthews suggested that the Mets could take the cash from CitiBank earmarked for the new stadium-naming rights and just hand it over to Manny. Since CitiBank is suckling at the ample bosom of the federal government for a fat, $300 billion bailout from you, me and every other taxpayer, it's nice that we can help a fella down on his luck find a job.

Hey, times are hard. The U.S. lost 522,000 more private-sector jobs in January, which is down slightly from the 659,000 jobs that were lost during December of 2008. Oddly enough, some of the numbers figured into the December total come from, coincidentally enough, Major League Baseball. You see, MLB decided to start a new television network on Jan. 1, 2009 so had to trim a little fat. As such, 30 or so folks who were working on the MLB web site were sent packing because, according to one report, they were making too much money.

You know, like $50,000 to $60,000 per year.

So in order to launch the network and to sign big-name stars like Bob Costas to wax philosophic, a dude writing stories for the web had to go. MLB gets its talking heads and Costas and whacks Ken Mandel.

Talk about a steal.

But wait, here's the good part... not only did MLB have to make those jobs cuts to restore order to its bottom line, it also had to make sure commissioner Bud Selig got his. Like we said before, times are hard. MLB only had $6.5 billion in revenues last year and not a dime came from taxpayer bailouts. Plus, Selig was paid $18.5 million in salary last year and not one single person ever went to the ballpark to see him.

Not one person ever.

So let's call Manny a Robin Hood in reverse. If the Mets swoop in to sign him with CitiBank bailout cash, it would be like stealing from the poor to give to the rich. You know, Reaganomics.

But Selig and MLB are bracing for the tough times and the rocky economic road ahead. With soaring ticket prices in places like the new stadium in New York coupled with the new network and a potential big check to be cut for Manny, Selig's company might slump to an even $6 billion in 2009.

"We're living in unprecedented economic times," Selig said at last month's owners' meetings. "We're trying to understand what it means."

To be fair, it won't take John Maynard Keynes to figure out this economic riddle. For as long as possible the pigs will feed whenever they want, for as long as they want.

So yeah, why shouldn't Manny turn up his nose at $25 million even in a time when jobs are being shed like hair on Telly Savalas' head? If Selig is stealing getting $18.5 million, maybe it's right that the economy should collapse.

Comment

Comment

What we Learned from Super Bowl 43

So, what did we learn from Sunday’s Super Bowl 43? Was there anything gleaned from that magnificent and furious finish in which the lead changed hands twice in the final two-and-a-half minutes? Is there anything we can learn about the Eagles from watching Big Ben, Kurt Warner, Santonio Holmes and Larry Fitzgerald?

Why yes. Yes there was.

First, we learned that the devastated economy is all encompassing and has even affected the quality of the television commercials broadcast during the game. C’mon, was anyone really impressed? Does anyone remember any ad that really stood out? There are people who write/blog about the cultural relevancy of the whole Super Bowl show and nobody really dived in to the commercial aspect of it.

And this is a good thing. Maybe it means advertisers are finished treating the audience like they are idiots. Besides, we’re all broke. We can’t buy what they’re selling anyway.

Continue reading this story...

Comment

Comment

Pickin' winners

Yes, it's clear to us that the Super Bowl is to football fans what New Year's Eve is to Keith Richards. It's strictly amateur hour. Do you think Keith needs to wait for the last day of the year to chug champagne and rock in midnight? Shoot, that's a quiet Tuesday night for Keith.

But make no mistake, Keith is out on New Year's Eve. He's out on New Year's Day, too. He's a pro. Just like you with your football.

Yeah, chances are you will have to sit in a crowded room with a bunch of football novices who ask inane questions about the nickel defense or smart-alecky comments from that one dude after every other play.

Such irreverence!

If that wasn't enough there is the gambling and all that baking. During the Super Bowl people bet on things like which player will score the first touchdown, how deep the kickoff will travel, or whether punter Mitch Berger is wearing a cup. The more absurd the wager the better, which makes the casseroles and other baked goods go down that much smoothly.

But where was this weeks ago? When the Eagles were getting all tied up in Cincinnati during November, was anyone taking action or putting pigs in a blanket?

No, of course not. You're on your own during the mean, 16-weeks of the season. If you wanted those tofu pups lined with vegan cheese it was up to you to carry your sorry rear to the microwave and do it yourself.

The Super Bowl, however, is the great equalizer. In fact, people will tell you they don't care or even like football and the reasons why as they cozy up to you on the couch to watch the game.

Who needs it? Maybe it's best to dim down the lights, close the curtains and sit there alone and watch the game all by yourself. Send the wife and kids to the anti-Super Bowl festivities down at the mall and strap in.

It's almost midnight and the clock is ticking.

Continue reading this story...

Comment

Comment

Stuck inside with nothing to do

There was a lot to talk about on Wednesday. The snow, rain and ice made sure of that by rendering the roads too treacherous for school buses and early-morning travel. As a result, the school kids (and the teachers) stayed in and chatted it up on Facebook or Twitter or via text or whatever other type of instant messenger they use these days.

But make no mistake about it, they’re talking. Oh yes, talking a blue streak.

Away from the normal work routines people were left to their own devices. Rather than shuffling papers around on a desk or spending too much time sending e-mails, the snowbound had plenty of time for all those diversions without that pesky work getting in the way.

Let someone else shovel, there’s poking to do on Facebook.

Be that as it may, for sports fans in Philadelphia things were as quiet as a snowflake landing gently in a big field (how’s that for imagery). Instead of planning a Super Bowl party or fretting over the NBA All-Star Game roster (ha-ha!), what was there to talk about?

How about talk? Let’s talk about talk.

In that regard we have two items aired on Comcast SportsNet when Eagles president Joe Banner rapped with Michael Barkann about the state of the team. And based on the reviews of the talk in the papers, well, Banner’s answers weren’t what some wanted to hear. Apparently, some want the Eagles to change simply for the sake of change. They want Andy Reid out or Donovan McNabb sent to another team, which is fine. Mixing things up every now and again is fun. Even the staunchest conservative has to admit that much.

But let’s give Banner some credit. At least he didn’t punt when Barkann asked the questions. He answered them without hemming and hawing or giving some dressed up rhetoric that really isn’t an answer to anything. He didn’t even stop to clear his voice and tick off the team’s injuries. Instead, he answered the questions. How novel a concept is that?

Continue reading the rest of the story...

Comment

1 Comment

Here's your boycott...

So Eagles’ fans got their first taste of a weekend without football following the loss to the Cardinals in the NFC Championship game two Sunday’s ago and it seems as if it didn’t go down too well. Lost and rudderless without the local football team to keep them anchored, the magnitude of the Eagles’ defeat resonated on the Richter scale in these parts.

Undoubtedly the depression felt during that week before the big championship game is an odd phenomenon. One would figure that Eagles fans would be used to it by now considering the team has been in just three Super Bowl/championship games since 1960 and five ever.

The big tease is nothing new from the football team in these parts.

Yet to listen to some folks – the die hards – the interest is gone. If there are no Eagles, there is no football. More interestingly, some have used the word “boycott” in conjunction with this Sunday’s Super Bowl. They won’t watch because seeing the Arizona Cardinals face the Pittsburgh Steelers in the big game is just too much to bear.

Really? Boycott? A football game?

Read the rest of this story

1 Comment

Comment

Rat Tales

For the rest of Center City and Philadelphia sports coverage, go to CSNPhilly.com

Every one loves a rat. Actually, let's rephrase that - everyone loves a rat that isn't ratting out them. In that case, nobody likes a rat. Ever.

But when it comes to the tawdry dirty laundry of public figures and so-called whistle blowers, yes, count us in. Better yet, the rat is a glorious slice of Americana. Our history is littered with 'em from Benedict Arnold, to Deep Throat, to Jose Canseco, Scooter Libby, to Jack Nicholson and Matt Damon in The Departed. Those shifty little buggers mystify and intrigue us.

Actually, let's clarify that, too.

You see, while the reporting of the filthiness from the so-called rat is a guilty pleasure[1], it's not something that we are willing to admit we give much thought. We're above such lowest-common denominator fodder that it's actually an insult to our intelligence.

At least that's what I was thinking while I read excerpts from Jay McGwire's "book" proposal on Deadspin. And yes I appreciate the irony of reading the notes of a tawdry tell-all on Deadspin.

Nevertheless, Jay McGwire is the estranged younger brother of disgraced slugger Mark McGwire, the guy who was the star of the baseball love-in during the summer of 1998 when he broke Roger Maris' single-season home run record. That was the year when, as little bro Jay wrote, Big Mark decided to go off deca-durabolin (allegedly the drug of choice for Roger Clemens and old-school weightlifters) and switch to androstenedione so he could get that needed testosterone boost without the pesky drawback of back zits and shrinkage.

Yeah.

Jay McGwire, in the leaked proposal, also downplayed Canseco's role in introducing McGwire to steroid, recommended low dosages in order to curb injuries, and mulled his place in baseball history.

"Who knows what might have happened if I didn't get Mark involved with all the training, supplements, the right foods, steroids, and HGH? He would not have broken any records, and the congressional hearings would have gone on without him. Maybe Barry Bonds wouldn't have ever gotten involved with the stuff, either."

Wait, Barry Bonds did illegal steroids, too? Man, this book proposal is just full of bombshells...

Oh yeah, Jay McGwire wrote that he felt bad watching his big brother's infamous testimony before Congress in 2005. That's nice.

Now here's the news flash... Jay McGwire doesn't have too many bites for his "book" proposal. It's a proposal that seemingly was leaked to a sports web site best known for its unrepentant stance of not having access to the teams or players and its willingness to dive into the stories the so-called reputable bastions of journalism would never touch. Plus, it isn't exactly a huge secret that big brother Mark might have had a few syringes plunged into his ass.

With the exception of Tony LaRussa, most of us get that by now. Certainly that 2005 Congressional testimony didn't help to sway people either.

So maybe the reason why Jay McGwire hasn't found too much interest in publishing his "book," is because we've already seen this car crash, did our rubbernecking, and drove past. We got it when McGwire quietly retired from baseball in 2001 and never came back. And we got it when he testified that he wasn't going to "talk about the past."

Maybe Jay McGwire should have studied his brother's moves and copied them, especially the part about not being a rat. Not that we don't enjoy a good rat every once in a while.

Besides, the younger McGwire already gave away the best parts.

What's that I smell...

While we're on the topic of rats, doesn't it seem as if baseball has had more cheese-eaters than the other sports? It must be all that waiting and standing around that gives people a chance to mull over every little thing going on in other people's lives.

Regardless, it seems as if the so-called "Rat Era" started with Jim Bouton's wonderful book, Ball Four. Not only was Bouton's book the first real sports tell-all, it created the template for nearly all the jock lit that followed.

In that regard we owe the cheers and the criticism to Bouton.

Other great all-timers include Sparky Lyle for The Bronx Zoo, which was tell-all about the late '70s New York Yankees filled with tales about Reggie Jackson, Billy Martin and the art of nude cake sitting.

Yeah.

Who can forget the great rat of the Phillies, Billy Wagner? Actually, Wagner never really was a rat, he just got that name from Pat Burrell because he dared to talk to members of the local baseball press after games.

Yeah, Wagner actually talked to those people.

The greatest clubhouse rat ever? Who could ever top Chico Esquela, the famous New York Met?

In his book Chico reported in Bad Things 'Bout The Mets that Tom Seaver took up two spaces in the team parking lot, and Ed Kranepool swiped his soap and never gave it back.

But in the end Chico had a message that everyone could agree with...

"Baseball been berry, berry good to me."


[1] Yes, it's a guilty pleasure because otherwise I would be in the lab solving all of the world's problems.

Comment

Comment

Money changes everything

They say you can’t be too rich or too thin. But then again, they say a lot of things. But maybe people can become too rich. Do “they” have a theory on that one? Maybe people can accumulate so much money that they don’t know what to do with it.

Or maybe they think it makes them classy or smart? You know, it’s a self-worth or ego thing or something.

But make no mistake about it, as Ryan Howard adds to his bankroll it nearly guarantees that the Phillies’ payroll will get thinner in the not-so distant future. Like in 2011 when the big fella is finally eligible to become a free agent.

And, oh yes, he will become a free agent.

You see, somewhere the brass for the Boston Red Sox and the New York Yankees quietly noted the landmark $18 million “request” from Howard to the Phillies in arbitration and stashed the info away. After all, it doesn’t really matter whether or not Howard “wins” in arbitration or not because, really, what’s the difference whether he makes $14 million and $18 million in ’09?

Actually, the difference is that the price tag already might be a little too heavy for the club. Oh yeah, forget about the fact that the team routinely sells out its new ballpark and that it just won the World Series and raised ticket prices. And forget the fact that Major League Baseball had $6.5 billion (with a “B”) – the cash is tight with the Phillies.

Just look at it. The Phillies finally began pushing the payroll into the rate befitting a ballclub in the fourth-largest media market in the country this decade. Yet while doing so the players with escalating salaries were quickly shed when “cheaper” alternatives became available.

What’s wrong with that? Well, nothing of course.

But think about for a second… right now the Phillies’ payroll is $112.68 million before Howard has even been signed. That figure already surpasses the amount in paychecks the team gave to its players in 2008. Plus, the two guys in that $14 million neighborhood were sent to other teams – one, Jim Thome, left before his contract expired. In fact, the Phillies are still on the hook for $3 million of Thome’s salary next season.

The other guy, Pat Burrell, didn’t get an offer for arbitration from the Phillies. Instead the Phillies gave 36-year old Raul Ibanez three years and $31.5 million.

It seems as if $14 million is where the Phillies draw the line.

So here's the $18 million question:

How much longer will the Phillies be able to afford him?

Think about it - the Phillies and Howard will more than likely be back in the same position again next year, only this time the slugger won’t be asking for a measly $18 million per season.

At least that’s the way the trends skew. Howard not only has set precedents in terms of salary for a player with his limited Major League experience, but he also is operating in unchartered territory when it comes to prolific power statistics. In fact, his 153 home runs and 431 RBIs during the past three seasons could be the greatest debut power years (non-alleged steroid division) ever. Forget the first full three seasons, there aren’t too many players in baseball history that have hit 153 homers in a career, let alone three consecutive seasons.

So where does that leave the Phillies now that Howard and his camp, led by his dad and agent Casey Close? And what happens if the big fella clubs 60 homers and 150 RBIs for a playoff team in ‘08? Can the Phillies afford not to work out a long-term deal with Howard just so they can avoid record payouts in arbitration year after year until 2011?

Or, did Howard price himself out of Philadelphia? The consensus from the fans was that Howard justly won his arbitration case last year. It also seems as if they are rooting for the big guy to get the big check again this year, too. But in doing so are they really rooting against themselves? Will they cheer as loudly for Howard when he's in New York or Boston?

That could be the scenario since the chatter out there is that Team Howard is seeking a long-term deal in the A-Rod strata. Surely the just thinking about something like that ought to be enough to cause some sleepless nights for some execs.

“He has made no indication that he wants to leave Philadelphia,” Amaro said. “I think this is an ideal situation for him. He has an opportunity to play for a winning team, and he has an opportunity to maximize what he does best which is to hit home runs and drive in runs. He is surrounded by quality players.”

Ah yes, but Howard just got his ring. Now get ready for him to start quoting Rod Tidwell because careers are short and that’s especially the case for guys like Howard. The truth is guys like Howard don’t last as long. Already 29, Howard is seemingly in the prime years for a big, lumbering and slugging type of player. History shows that the big fellas just don’t last that long -- especially if they have to play in the field. The game is littered with guys like Howard who were washed up before their 35th birthday. Greg Luzinski was washed up at 33; Boog Powell at 34; Mo Vaughn at 34; John Kruk at 33; Kent Hrbek at 34… the list goes on and on. Even 33-year old David Ortiz is beginning to break downThe one big guy who has lasted a long time is Frank Thomas and that comes in part because he’s played just 36 games in the field since 2001, and missed nearly 2½ seasons because of injuries.

Need more? The geeks at “Baseball Prospectus” suggested that Howard could be peaking in its 2007 yearbook:

Historically, players like Howard, big-bodied guys with limited defensive skills such as Mo Vaughn and Boog Powell, tended to have high but brief peak periods. Their legs just couldn’t carry that much mass for very long, and around 30 their defense plummeted, their playing time dropped due to nagging injuries, and their singles dried up and disappeared. The Phillies should have a three-year window in which they can expect this kind of production from Howard, but should not plan beyond that.

So the Phillies aren’t ready to break the bank for Howard just yet. Not when they don’t have to. Or maybe it’s just a matter of getting creative with Howard. Though recent history shows that the high-priced talent gets shipped out of town (Bobby Abreu, Scott Rolen, Thome, Burrell) before the it gets too steep, historically, the team has showed a creative side.

The Phillies were creative when they signed Pete Rose in 1979, they also had Mike Schmidt when he was the highest-paid player in the game, and they signed Lance Parrish for (relative) big money when the other owners had been judged to have colluded against free-agent players.

Still, the Phillies have never dealt with something like Ryan Howard.

Not many teams have.

So here we go again. Once again the Phillies head into the deep waters with their greatest slugger ever in the second annual salary quest. Can’t make it this year… no problem, the cash prizes will be even bigger in 2010.

Maybe then the Phillies will empty out their pockets and dig into the sofa cushions and find a $200 million check sitting around. Plus, there will likely be a lot of fans willing to shell out plenty of money for tickets to watch the Howard and his Phillies’ teammates attempt to repeat as World Series champs in 2009.

A bake sale ain’t getting this one done, folks. There aren’t that many brownies in the world to sell.

Comment

Comment

This time the athletes are inspired

WASHINGTON – When Dave Winfield was growing up in Minnesota, he thought his future lied somewhere far away from where he ended up. For Winfield, the Hall-of-Fame baseball player, his childhood career ambition was to work in politics.

That all changed when Winfield was 16 in April of 1968. That’s when Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated and everything changed. Young Dave Winfield had second (and third) doubts about a career in politics and the rest, as it turned out, was baseball history.

One has to wonder which career path Winfield would take if he were 16 in January of 2009. Would athletics be as alluring (Winfield was drafted by a team in the NBA, ABA and NFL as well as MLB) for a kid looking to carve out his path in life nearly 41 years after that April day in 1968?

It’s hard to say. But it is worth noting that Winfield made his Major League debut a little more than 26 years after Jackie Robinson became the first African-American to play in the Major Leagues. Imagine that… Major League Baseball, holder of the mantle of the so-called American pastime, refused to allow good ballplayers to play for its teams simply because of the color of their skin.

For decades after Robinson first played for Brooklyn in 1947, integrated teams could not stay together in some hotels in certain parts of the United States. They couldn’t eat together in certain restaurants and they certainly weren’t socializing in public in some places.

In fact, not too long before April of ’68 there were some restaurants in Washington, D.C. that would not have allowed Winfield to enter. Just beyond the Lincoln Memorial in Virginia, forget it…

Yet on Tuesday, as the morning became the afternoon, Winfield mixed in with the masses on the Washington Mall to watch a man whose father was born in Kenya and a mother born in Kansas be inaugurated as President of the United States.

“It's just a unique time and place,” Winfield said. “My wife and I felt we should be a part of this one.”

“This is something you want to say you were there to witness.”

Before a sea of humanity stretching from the U.S. Capitol all the way to the Woodrow Wilson Bridge heading into Virginia, the first African-American gave an address in which the themes were inclusion, duty, honor and sacrifice. He put the injustice of slavery in context with other hardscrabble lives. He made it part of the immigrant experience no different than the inscription on the Statue of Liberty.

"Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"

Just that bit of imagery took America to a place it had never been.

So maybe in the crowd beneath the memorials in monuments surrounding that great lawn could be a talented kid just like Winfield was. And maybe instead of a career playing baseball or football or basketball he (or she) opts for a life of service.

Perhaps a 16-year-old kid will see Jimmy Rollins taking in the big moment and see that even sports stars and MVPs can be inspired. A historian of the Negro Leagues and a gatekeeper of Robinson’s legacy, Rollins closely followed the 2008 election and reported that he was really interested in learning as much as possible about the candidates.

Sixers’ guard Andre Miller also made it to Washington for the inauguration though he says he never moved and preferred to keep his political views to himself. Miller was simply moved by the history of the moment and allowed himself to be swept up in it all.

Meanwhile, former Sixers’ center and Georgetown star, Dikembe Mutombo, also attended the events, joining other notable athletes like Tiger Woods, Muhammad Ali and John Thompson in Washington.

Needless to say, the moment was not lost on Mutombo, who first came to the U.S. from The Congo to attend Georgetown with the hope of becoming a doctor. Like Winfield, sports were a better fit.

“We have the son of an African man, not from a second or third generation, from the first generation. That brings so much joy and so much pride for me,” Mutombo said.

“Now I can tell my son, ’You cannot tell me you can’t be the next Bill Gates or the next senator.’ I’m feeling good about my children,” Mutombo said. “I know I’m going to cry a lot, but I want to be there.”

Certainly Mutombo's words were a popular sentiment on Tuesday.

Comment

Comment

Defining a legacy

Sometimes sports aren't fair. No matter what a guy does through the years of his career, he is often judged by one single play or one last little drive late in a game.

That's where Donovan McNabb found himself on Sunday with a little less than three minutes to go in Sunday's NFC Championship game in Arizona. It's a tough spot to be sure, but make no mistake about it, McNabb's career could very well be defined by his performance in those last few plays in the desert.

Tough spot.

But this time there was no fourth-and-26 miracle. No sudden death catches or runs with the game in the balance. No glory, no cheers and no stunning turn of events.

Instead, McNabb's final pass rolled harmlessly away on the desert grass as receiver Kevin Curtis lay face down and screaming for justice.

No flags, no hope, no second chance.

And no glory.

It ended like it had three times before with McNabb and his teammates watching another team celebrate beneath a cloud of confetti.

Yes, stopped short in the big game once again.

“It was perfect for us. We just weren’t able to pull it through,” McNabb said.

Perhaps McNabb is just one of those guys destined to get close, but always fall a little short. Actually, sports is littered with guys like that – guys who come close year in and year out, but when the career comes to an end there are no rings for the fingers.

Charles Barkley, Patrick Ewing, Dan Marino, Ted Williams are just a quick list of all-time greats that completed long, record-breaking careers without much of a sniff at a championship.

That’s not totally the case with McNabb, who has gotten a pretty big whiff in his decade with the Eagles. Five times he’s been to the NFC Championship game and just one time he made it to the Super Bowl.

Even that one ended with a dry heave in the middle of the field, remnants of yet another failed final drive.

“It’s always tough when you get this close,” McNabb said after the 32-25 loss to the Cardinals in championship loss No. 4. “We were one game away from our goal and we were a couple of minutes away from getting to the Super Bowl and continuing on…”

McNabb’s voice trailed off at that point. Oh sure, he kept talking, but it was nothing more than a mash-up of clichés delivered without feeling. Certainly McNabb knew what this one meant. There are no guarantees that he will ever get another shot at championship game No. 6. That’s especially the case after the unconventional run the Eagles took this time to get to the showdown in the desert.

After all, the Eagles are a pretty much a finished product. Yeah, there are pieces to add – a receiver here, a lineman there, veterans to deal with – but with McNabb, what you see is what you get. He’s not going to suddenly regain his rushing prowess or develop an extra deftness on his passes.

As they say, it is what it is.

“I guess I’ve been building for 10 years so I can’t sit and say about the building aspect of things,” McNabb said. “I think each year is an opportunity for you to add more weapons and add more guys that can contribute heavily and play a major part in what you want to do.”

So that’s what the Eagles will do once again. Stopped short before the Super Bowl for the fourth time in five tries over eight years, the Eagles have a lot of big questions to answer before they go to training camp in Bethlehem, Pa. in the heat of the summer.

Some of those questions concern whether coach Andy Reid, safety Brian Dawkins and/or McNabb will return for another run to finish the job. Another shot at defining his legacy.

“I don't know,” McNabb said when asked about his future with the Eagles. “We'll see what happens.”

Understandably, the Eagles’ brass will comb over the details. Though this has been a wildly successful era in the team’s history, maybe even the most successful time since the back-to-back NFL Championships in 1948 and 1949, team president Joe Banner says some soul searching is coming.

Maybe even some sleepless nights, too.

“If you keep doing the same thing over and over again and expect a different result, you’re fooling yourself,” Banner told Comcast SportsNet’s Derrick Gunn. “Not to devalue five trips to the championship game, but we will evaluate what we need to do.”

Fairly or unfairly, that’s all they can do.

Comment

Comment

Root, root, root for the team nearby

Driving home on the Turnpike the other night, I couldn’t help to notice one of those Penn DOT signs that read, “Go Steelers,” “Go Eagles,” “Drive Safely.”

It was hard not to notice because it the letters were orange, flashing and it was dark. They usually wait to trot that kind of stuff out there when the sun goes down.

But there was another phrase that popped up on that blinking board on the side of the road somewhere near the Downingtown exit. It was this part of the sign that hung there in the darkness that stood out the most. The weird part was that it was such a harmless little grouping of words that were probably plugged in there by a guy after he had just finished spreading some rock salt on the icy roads.

It read:

“Turnpike Super Bowl.”

Yeah. Let the significance of that sink in for a bit.

(I’ll wait.)

Apparently, geography isn’t as important as it seems in football allegiance. Instead, good old fashioned parochialism and front-running is the great determining factor. Just because a team is from the same state in which one is born doesn’t make them the “home team.”

Here’s what I mean:

Let’s get in a car and start in Philadelphia. For argument’s sake, we’ll start in the parking lot of the Wachovia Center on the side facing Lincoln Financial Field. You know, the lot where you need a special pass to park on game days.

From there we’ll go over the Walt Whitman, hook onto the New Jersey Turnpike and head up to Exit 16W. At that point we can drive into the Giants Stadium parking lot, loop around once, and then get back on the road to head south back to Philadelphia.

Keep a close look at the clock because we’re timing this.

Here’s part two:

Again we’ll start in the Wachovia Center lot, only this time we’ll get on I-95 and head south. After barreling through Delaware, Maryland and the Key Tunnel, we’ll keep heading south though we’ll give a nice salute to the M&T Bank Stadium out the passenger-side window.

In a few more minutes we’ll hit Landover, Md., the once proud home of the Capitol Center, the ugliest arena in the history of big-time American professional athletics. In Landover we’ll find a big, hulking stadium where we take a lap, exit the grounds, return to I-95 and head north to Philly.

So what does this prove? For one thing it proves that in the time it takes to drive on the PA Turnpike to Pittsburgh, a person can motor from Philly to the Meadowlands, or from Philly to the Washington, D.C. suburbs and back in less time.

That’s two different NFL franchises in each direction – four total – that are closer to us than the one all the way across the state.

Pittsburgh? Hell, it ought to be on the other side of the moon.

Better yet, when one moves farther west from Philly they actually get closer to Baltimore. For instance, my house in Lancaster is closer to the Baltimore stadiums than it is to the Sports Complex by a whopping four miles.

It’s a faster drive, too. No Schuylkill.

And yet Pennsylvanians on the eastern and south central ends of the Commonwealth continue to root for Pittsburgh teams and TV networks beam in Steelers games on Sundays. Sometimes they even do it at the expense of the Eagles and Baltimore Ravens.

The Redskins? Hell, D.C. ought to be on the other side of the moon.

So, at least on this end of Pennsylvania, the Steelers benefit from folks who escaped from Pittsburgh. Look, generalizing is bad. It’s not nice. But often with things that are bad or not nice, generalizing can be easy and fun. So let’s generalize about Steelers’ fans for a moment – you know, the ones from Pittsburgh as well as the kids growing up in the 1970s who saw Lynn Swann and John Stallworth and thought it would be fun to root for a good team.

These are the same types of people who rooted for the Cowboys because they liked that blue star on the helmets. Nothing wrong with that. It’s better than liking a team because it’s in the same state.

Back to the generalizations…

There are notions about people from Pittsburgh. Like they are all angry, have primordial facial features, and enjoy soaking in a cesspool of human bile. People from Pittsburgh also have scabs on their knuckles from where they drag them when they walk.

That isn’t right, is it?

Then again, Pittsburgh is so bad that people from Philadelphia look down on it… that means it has to be bad.

Go ahead, say I’m generalizing, or call me an anti-Pittsburghite, because you just might be right. But before you do, think about this: how many people from Pittsburgh do you know? Think for a second… I bet it’s quite a few. Like Tom Kowalski, Frank Kowalik, Jim Kowalewski, Ed Kowalak, Stan Kowalka, Pete Kowalkowski, Mike Kowalczyk, Christina Aguilera, Andy Warhol, and Rocky Blier. Now think of where all those people live.

I bet it isn’t in Pittsburgh.

Just be thankful you aren’t stuck in traffic in Atlanta.

So before we park ourselves in front of the TV tomorrow to watch the Conference Championships, let’s think about the proper matchups. Just because two of the teams anchor a long stretch of road six hours apart doesn’t mean it’s a heated rivalry. In fact, the best Super Bowl matchup is probably Philadelphia vs. Baltimore.

Never mind the proximity of the two teams (after all, the game will be played in Tampa and not some halfway point between the cities like Aberdeen), there are many common threads.

One is the Ravens’ coach Jim Harbaugh is one of Andy Reid’s guys. Andy groomed Jim Harbaugh, he showed young Jim the ropes and kept him employed for many years with the Eagles. First it was as a special teams coach, then he moved up the ladder to various coordinator positions. And as the Eagles’ fortunes grew in the NFC, so too did Harbaugh’s.

Now he’s all grows up.

Plus, it was against Baltimore where Reid unceremoniously yanked quarterback Donovan McNabb from the lineup in that ugly whipping by the Ravens. It was that came that set the whole late-season run in motion and forced the star-crossed McNabb to search for his missing mojo.

Without the Baltimore Ravens stomping all over the Eagles in November, it seems unlikely that we’d be in the position to discuss a Super Bowl matchup.

However, there is the matter of the Baltimore Ravens themselves. Baltimore is not the Ravens. No, no, no! Baltimore is the Colts. The Baltimore Colts. Always has been and always will be. In fact, the NFL should step in and force the Indianapolis franchise to return the name and colors back to Baltimore where they rightfully belong.

Let the people of Indianapolis pick their own Edgar Allen Poe poem to name their team after. Johnny Unitas, Alan Ameche, Raymond Berry and John Mackey played for the Baltimore Colts. Art Donovan, Lenny Moore and Gino Marchetti are Baltimore Colts.

When Baltimore was tearing up the NFL, Indianapolis wasn’t even on the map (OK, it was, but we’re ranting here). Let them be the Indiana Larry Birds or something. The Colts belong to Baltimore.

In other words, I will predict that Philadelphia will face Baltimore in the Super Bowl. Let Pittsburgh have their Heinz ketchup and disgusting sandwiches topped off with fries, some type of meat patty and a fried egg with cole slaw mixed in.

It’s gonna be Philly vs. Ballmer, baby.

________________________________________________________________ Ed. note: Frankly, I really have nothing against Pittsburgh or Pittsburghers. It really doesn't matter to me where a person is from. I also don't care about what team one chooses to root for either. But ridiculous "city rip" stories with even more ridiculous generalizations of the people from a particular place are quite intriguing. And now that I finally tried it, I'm sorry Pittsburgh. I just wanted to hack it up for fun. Thanks.
Indianapolis... you're on your own. ________________________________________________________________

Comment

Comment

All ball all the time

To be honest, my sports viewing diet is rather sparse. Frankly, I'm a grazer. I'll watch the Eagles throughout the year when it doesn't interfere with time with the kids and I'll tune in for the Flyers and Sixers as it pertains to work, but that's about it.

Remembering the day when I gave up on the NBA feels like it did at the last day of a summer job. You know, it's kind of bittersweet in a coming-of-age kind of way, but not a big enough moment to warrant a cake.

But that doesn't mean there aren't sports I won't go back to the buffet for. If it's baseball, a big track meet, basketball games from the late '70s and '80s, and hockey stories from Keith Jones, sign me up. I'm carving out a spot on the couch with the intent on feeling my ass grow.

Fun stuff.

But as far as I know, there is no marathon running channel (Marathon of Marathons?) for Comcast subscribers. If there was, maybe three people would watch and two of them would be hostages in my house. Occasionally on the NBA channel they show a "golden age" game with the Showtime Lakers, the Bird/McHale Celtics and the Sixers, but not too often.

Aside from the freeform offenses, who didn't love the '80s style? Short shorts and Charles Barkley? It's a wonder they don't run those old games in a loop.

And last I heard the Keith Jones variety show is not in the works. For shame.

Starting January 1, Major League Baseball started its own television network. Yes, just like the NFL and NBA, MLB waded deeper into the multimedia pool with its own channel. More notably, MLB is marketing the hell out of the channel with promises of baseball talk, old games, documentaries and Ken Burns.

More importantly, there was no mention of that Field of Dream/NPR baseball as a metaphor for life/abstract thinking at all. This is important because usually three seconds after that kind of catch-with-your-dad stuff starts, I go into the bushes and puke.

Yeah, I go for the seedy side of baseball - I like to work blue. Worse, like a big city marathon, I can watch baseball games all day. Frankly, it's a sickness, like the shingles.

Anyway, in order to get a better gauge of what's going on with the MLB Network and take some medicine before the cold snap envelops us while the cool kids get to go to Arizona to watch football, I embarked on an experiment and (maybe) a public service.

From 10 p.m. on Wednesday night to 10 a.m. on Thursday morning, I grabbed the remote, turned it to channel 280 and settled in to soak in what the new network had to offer. I figured 12 hours was enough to get a good sampling of the type of programming MLB was going to trot out there. Actually, 12 hours might be just enough time to get everything they have.

Here's what we saw:

Thursday, 10 p.m. Hot Stove

This is the main show for the MLB Network. And based on the rest of the programming lineup for the rest of the evening/morning, MLB has a lot of guys sitting on the bench. Ex-Phillies Mitch Williams and Dan Plesac are signed on to work for the channel, and Jimmy Rollins has appeared in a handful of segments in the studio, including a standout in which he paid tribute to Rickey Henderson's induction into the Hall of Fame:

We're not sure about the technical term, but there seems to be different "pods" in the studio - all with clever baseball themed names - earmarked to deliver different types of information. It appears to be a new trend in TV news to show movement or flexibility with the show. In actuality it makes me dizzy, but gives the rest of the talkers to get out of their seats as if they were the weather man in front of the blue screen.

Blue screens for everyone!

But no blue screen for the main gang at the desk. Make that a long wood desk. Maybe an oak desk, because Harold Reynolds[1], the star of the network, looks like an oak man. Fellow oak men and MLB All-Stars, Al Leiter and Barry Larkin also saddle up with Reynolds for a spirited discussion/debate about the news of the day with panel host, Vic Rojas, the son of ex-Phillie, Cookie Rojas.

This time they talked about the election of Jim Rice into the Hall of Fame, the candidacy of Andre Dawson as a Hall of Famer and the voting process. When BBWAA members Tom Verducci and Jon Heyman joined the panel they discussed how stats and sabermetrics are not effective ways to measure players of different eras, though, strangely, did not dive into the voting process.

Why confuse the people so late at night?

The banter was all well and good and somewhat interesting, though not anything people couldn't watch from any other yack-fest on TV. Just because a few big-league All-Stars offer opinions about the baseball news of the day doesn't make it more insightful.

But where it gets really good is when the trio shifts to the studio with a faux diamond to demonstrate the process and nuance of pitching or hitting. Better yet, Leiter and Larkin got really into a pitching demonstration in which the old lefty explained the thinking behind pitching to a hitter like Larkin just by how he set himself up in the box.

Even better, they all dressed in matching dark track suits that kind of made them look like a less-hip version of Devo.

After the demonstration they went into a whole thing from the update desks where they reported that there was an overflow media crowd in Baltimore for the introductory press conference of Koji Uehara.

Really? Koji Uehara? Did the Ravens' practice let out early? Was Anna Benson there? Word is she was quite popular when she pitched for the Orioles a few years ago.

That was Anna, right?

They didn't actually show footage from Baltimore so I changed the channel to catch the end of "Blazing Saddles." As a result, I don't recall if there is theme music to the "Hot Stove" show. If I were them I'd contact Donna Summer's people about the rights to "Hot Stuff." They can change the lyrics to "Hot Stove."

No?

Thursday 11 p.m. & 11:30 p.m. Prime 9

Not exactly a deep concept to this show. There are nine positions on the ball diamond and nine places in the batting order. There are usually nine monks involved in important Buddhist rituals, nine planets in the solar system and "Love Potion No. 9" was a big hit for The Clovers in 1955, though none of those things are relevant here.

Nevertheless, on this show they pick a theme and count down from nine to one. Yeah, kind of a poor-man's Casey Kasem.

On this episode they counted down the nine best "characters" of the game. Our boy Larry Andersen was No. 8. They showed footage of him with sunflower seeds all over his face... yeah. Sunflower seeds made him a character.

Now who doesn't like like Larry Andersen? Or sunflower seeds? Still, it was pretty weird to see L.A. with that crap sticking out of face in that gaudy Houston Astros uniform that was hardly flattering. Remember Charlie Kerfeld in that uni? Oh yes, he definitely melted butter whenever he showed up on a TV screen. Scorching.

But after watching L.A. and the seeds (good band name?) I had enough and switched to Charlie Rose.

Charlie Rose is an oak man, too.

Midnight Seasons

Now this one was good. What they do is pick a year and dive into the big occurrences of the baseball season with interviews, footage and all of that good stuff. Luckily, I caught the 1986 episode, which was of great interest since I consider myself a buff of the '86 postseason.

I also consider myself a buff of the U.S. Presidents, Watergate, punk rock, U.S. geography, and the literature of Paul Auster.

But the 1986 baseball season... man, that's almost as intricate and involved as a Shakespeare tragedy. Only real. All too real. There's Dave Henderson, the Mets, Bill Buckner, Donnie Moore, Roger Clemens with baby fat cheeks (before he met Brian McNamee) and the craziest playoffs ever.

And, of course, Game 6.

By now there aren't too many secrets about Game 6 and the bottom of the 10th of that day game at Shea Stadium, but it was interesting to see the video of Bob Costas in that tiny visitors' clubhouse with the champagne, Mrs. Yawkey, and protective plastic all set up. It was also pretty cool to see different angles of the Mets' celebration after the ball skidded through Buckner's legs.

Still, it kind of glossed over the deep cuts of that series, because to dive in any deeper would take Ken Burns and his entire team of documentarians.

Nevertheless, it wasn't a bad way to spend the early hours of a day.

Yet it seems as if MLB doesn't have enough programming yet. Instead of replaying old games, the network showed "Hot Stove" in a loop before restarting the entire cycle at 11 a.m.

Come on.

Previously they showed Don Larsen's perfect game in the 1956 World Series, which had never been rebroadcast before. They also showed some of the games from the 1989 ALCS between the Blue Jays and A's, which doesn't exactly scream, "CLASSIC!"

I don't know, maybe they can dive into the deep end and swim around with some different kind of shows. Perhaps these shows could be something to investigate:

"Drops: Inside a Rain Delay."

"Mustachio: From the Push Broom to the Handlebar - Great Mustaches of the MLB."

Tom Selleck could host this one with drop-ins with Bobby Grich, Ron Cey and, of course, Rollie Fingers.

"Bleep You! The Intricacies of the Umpire-Manager Dynamic."

Those are just a few of the top of my head. I can fill 24 hours for MLB easily.


[1] Interesting aside about Harold Reynolds... during the World Series workout in St. Petersburg, Harold and a few other MLBers were getting a hard time from security about not having his credential handy when walking into the stadium. A few of his cohorts were joking around doing that whole, "Don't you know who I am" schtick. So when we got onto the elevator I told the story about Frank Sinatra (or was it Milton Berle) who when asked for ID said, "You want ID? My face is my ID." So cocky, but so funny, too. Not sure if Harold Reynolds is to the level of notability of The Chairman (or Uncle Milty) yet. He's a handsome devil, though.

Comment

Comment

Funny how things change

We have been here before. Not too long ago, in fact. It was a different sport and a different man, but essentially the message was the same.

"Get that guy out of here!"

"Fire him now!"*

They screamed it from the headlines, the radio airwaves and if there were accessible rooftops, surely they sounded those barbaric yalps from there, too.

To most around here, the knee-jerk reactions were not only expected but kind of warranted. Even some of the so-called "thoughtful" types agreed that it was time to go. Time for some new blood and a new face. A different accent or louder voice.

But Charlie is still here and will be until the day he decides to retire (or 2011, whichever comes first). And Andy seems to have a similar deal, only he gets to pick his players and tell them which way to move on the field.

Only now, very few people are complaining and the ones that are have been shouted down.

It's a funny thing how fortunes change in sports. It's almost as funny as Terry Francona winning the World Series twice in four seasons with the Boston Red Sox. You remember Terry Francona, right? Phillies manager... fired after four losing seasons with a roster made up of kids and has-beens. Yep, things worked out well for Francona.

It took Charlie Manuel winning seasons and two playoff berths to win the World Series for the Phillies. But if those calling for his head would have had their way it might have been just a little more than two winning seasons. In fact, nationally known broadcaster Keith Olbermann called for Manuel's head during that woeful April of 2007 when the manager had a dust-up with a radio guy in some sort of reality version of a reality TV show.

Or something like that.

Quoth Olbermann in April of 2007 of the 4-10 Phillies:

"I think Charlie Manuel is going to get fired. I think the Phillies have woefully mismanaged their pitching staff. They have starters who should be relieving and relievers who should be starting and it's a mess. The batting order is a mistake. Pat Burrell was not the guy to bat behind Ryan Howard and it's going to ruin Ryan Howard this season and it's even going to hurt Chase Utley ahead of him because they're going to pitch around Howard and Utley isn't going to have a chance to steal bases. Wes Helms at third base might be a good hitter, but they are just now noticing that he might not be the most mobile infielder. There are a lot of problems and I'm not really sure if Charlie Manuel is a good manager."

Five months later Manuel had the Phillies in the playoffs for the first time since grunge was cool and got a contract extension to boot. Eighteen months later he got the Phillies their first world title since Kool & the Gang topped the charts, landed the city's first championship since fo', fo', fo', and snagged another contract extension.

"That's pretty good," Charlie probably said.

Now that Appalachian twang of Charlie's is homey instead a source of amusement for Philly natives (as if the Philly accent is any better) and his in-game decisions are valued as cognizant and astute baseball moves instead of fly-by-the-seat-of-your-pants decisions.

Better yet, he is in charge of the team. Just ask Jimmy Rollins about that.

"Every manager has their own specialty, and Charlie has a way of handling people. It's a little different than everybody else's, and he's been ridiculed over time about the way he talks or the way he acts, whatever it is," Jamie Moyer said after the World Series. "But you know what? We know Charlie in this room, and the fans have gotten to know Charlie and gotten to understand Charlie and respect him for who he is. And I think that's one thing Charlie gets in this clubhouse: He gets respect from the players."

That's the same deal with Andy Reid. Nobody feels as if they know the Eagles' coach the way they have come to know Manuel, but that really doesn't matter to Reid - or at least it seems that way. The important part is that his players know the drill with their coach.

Yeah, there was that time with Donovan McNabb going to the bench when Reid didn't personally inform his QB he had been lifted, but even that slip up now seems to be a motivator.

Still, Reid rarely wavers. Everything is consistent. His demeanor, sideline outfits, press conferences, play calling and won-lost record have been uncannily solid, minus the hiccups.

"When you have a coach who stays the course, it helps everyone stay the course," strong safety Quintin Mikell told The New York Times.

Had the course remained on the same course it was heading in November, either Reid or McNabb (or both) likely were going to land in new locales. But no more than two months later, the two look like they are heading off into the sunset together.

Who knows, maybe they'll win one finally, too.

Yes, we've been here before.

______________________________________________________

* Isn't odd that given the state of the media business these days that media types would call for anyone's job? Really? They're still doing that?

Comment

Comment

Ain't no stopping us now

THE TOWN FORMERLY KNOWN AS ANGRYVILLE - They handle defeat very well in Phoenix or Glendale or wherever it is the Cardinals play these days. They don't mope, freak out, or litter the field with D-sized batteries during the action. They really don't even complain, to be perfectly frank. Actually, they're used to it. They just go home. They leave early and fight traffic. They put the crippling defeats out of their minds by skipping work to play in the sun. They just forget about it as they frolic in the Bermuda grass beneath cactus trees with cool drinks and lots of pretty friends.

Loss? Nah, they don't deal with it at all in Arizona. Who has the time?

In Philadelphia we know loss all too well. It's in our DNA. It's intense... no wait, that's wrong. It's intensity.

At least it was.

Back in the old days we all woke up before the dawn just as the rage had regrouped so we could wipe the bitter-tasting bile that has encrusted the corners of our mouths with the outer black sleeve of our spittle-coated Motor Head t-shirts. Then we dragged our sorry asses off the couch where we collapsed just 45 minutes earlier and instinctively thrust a middle finger at the rest of the world.

The day had begun in Philadelphia. The fury must be unleashed. We lost again.

But there is always a fleeting moment - one that usually occurs in the time it takes to get from one knee to a standing position after unfolding oneself from the couch - when stock is taken. A moment, as fast as a flap of a hummingbird's wing, enters our twisted and angry heads:

World weary. Saddened by my years on the road. Seen a lot. Done a lot. Loss? Yeah, I know loss. I know loss with its friends sorrow, fury and death. Yes, loss and me are like this... we're partners as we walk on the dusty trail of life.

But something happened last October. Beneath that tiney, porcupine-like exterior, glimpses into our souls were exposed. There was warmth, fear, insecurity...

Victory?

Yes, victory. The Phillies won the World Series. The Eagles are going to the Super Bowl (yeah, I said it). Both of these things are happening barely three months apart. Kind of like it was 1980-81 all over again.

Is Bruce Springsteen still as popular as he was during the dawn of the Reagan Administration? Oh yeah, here in the dawn of the Obama Administration, Springsteen is playing halftime at the Super Bowl.

Coincidentally, the Eagles will go to Arizona and then Tampa to bring Philly its second parade in three months (excluding the Mummers). The Phillies went to Los Angeles and Tampa to win their World Series. During the World Series the weather wrecked havoc on the action while the beautiful west-coast and closed roofs on the road made the elements a pleasant afterthought.

For the Eagles, forecasters are predicting a frigid January cold snap this weekend. Could there be a more perfect time to go to Arizona?

In the old days during the B.C. Era[1], Tampa and Arizona were places that made it easy to look down upon with our sad, wretched lives of angry and failed dreams. In Glendale, Ariz. and Tampa, with their white, sandy beaches, gourmet restaurants, unimpeded gentrification, high-brow universities and sunshiny skies where for 364 days God gives them the gift of perfect weather and climate.

That 365th day it might get cloudy.

Those were the places Philly fans showed up en masse to watch our teams fight for our civic pride. Back in the old, B.C. Era, they saw us coming. We stuck out with that crippled walk of defeat, clenched jaws of stress and disgust, fists balled up and middle fingers erect. When we took the exit ramp off the boulevard of broken dreams to enter these happy, little towns, the local authorities were ready. They had been tipped off ahead of time and were prepared to set up a dragnet at a moment's notice.

But those condescending attitudes and the arrogance in which those people flit through life so carefree and cheery no longer sting. We don't turn them back with our jealousy and resentment. No, instead we take the hackery in stride. The mockery and stereotypes don't hurt any longer.

It's just one of those annoying things that championship cities are used to.

Hey, who knows... maybe there is a bit of respect coming our way? Oh sure, they still trot out the golden oldies:

Boo Santa. Cheer injuries. Snowballs at the Cowboys. Batteries for J.D. Drew. Cheesesteaks. Cracked bells. Anger and passion. Rocky Balboa.

But try this out... sportswriters are afraid of Philadelphians. At least that's (kind of) the contention of one mainstreamer writing for one of those new-fangled web sites.

Really? Uh... nice! So maybe this means that now that the proverbial shoe is on the proverbial other foot, the whole hacky city rip thing is finished? Instead maybe they'll write about the actual ballclubs instead of all the clichés?

Think so?

Of course not.

During the Phillies' run Charlie Manuel was often prophetic, but never more than when he said:

"Winning is hard. Nothing about winning comes easy," Charlie Manuel said. "... believe me, there's a price you pay for winning, too."

That price can sometimes mean dignity, self-respect and the ability to think clearly.

We're inside the looking glass, people. The Phillies won, the Eagles are winning and the Flyers are in first place.

All things considered, it ain't all that bad to be in Philadelphia.


[1] B.C. is "Before Championship(s)"

Comment